Skip to content
Review Open access

THE ROLE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN GUIDING POINT-OF-CARE ULTRASOUND FOR DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS DIAGNOSIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Aug 2026 · Veredas do Direito · 0 citations · 25 references

TL;DR

It is demonstrated that the hybrid AI-human model achieved high diagnostic performance for ruling out proximal DVT, with a sensitivity of 90-100% and a negative predictive value (NVP) of 87.5-100%.

Abstract

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a significant global health burden. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) enhances diagnostic access but is dependent on the operator. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been proposed to guide novices and standardize image acquisition, often within a hybrid model incorporating remote clinician review. This systematic review aimed to synthesize the diagnostic accuracy, clinical feasibility, and health economic impact of AI-guided POCUS for DVT diagnosis within AI-human hybrid models. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, searching databases (PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE, and Google Scholar) for studies published between 2021 and 2025. Four studies met the eligibility criteria, assessing AI-guided POCUS systems for DVT diagnosis. These studies demonstrated that the hybrid AI-human model achieved high diagnostic performance for ruling out proximal DVT, with a sensitivity of 90-100% and a negative predictive value (NVP) of 87.5-100%. Reviewer expertise significantly impacted accuracy; emergency medicine POCUS-trained physicians outperformed general radiologists. The model was feasible for non-expert operators (e.g., nurses) with minimal training and showed potential to reduce unnecessary duplex ultrasound referrals by 29–58%, with associated workflow efficiency. AI-guided POCUS combined with mandatory clinician review forms an effective hybrid model that enhances access, standardizes quality, and safely rules out DVT. Successful real-world implementation requires targeted reviewer training, workflow integration, and further health economic and independent pragmatic evaluation.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Jul 2026

Artificial intelligence for lung ultrasound interpretation: a systematic review

The development of AI systems to support LUS interpretation shows high potential; however, current studies exhibit significant heterogeneity in their objectives, methodologies, and evaluation metrics.

Julia López-Canay, Alberto Fernández-Villar, Cristina Ramos-Hernández et al. · 1 citation
Review Open access Jul 2026

Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence-assisted early detection of breast cancer using ultrasound imaging: A systematic review

Current evidence supports AI-assisted breast ultrasound's clinical potential, but further prospective multicenter studies with standardized methodologies and external validation are needed before routine clinical implementation.

W. A. Utami, Siti Wahyuni, Miska Zamharira et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Artificial Intelligence for Automated Detection of Large Vessel Occlusion: State of the Art, Clinical Applications and Future Perspectives

AI-assisted LVO detection has the potential to improve the speed and coordination of acute stroke care, particularly for proximal anterior circulation occlusions, but should augment rather than replace clinician interpretation.

Ishaan Bakshi · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Ultrasound: Clinical Applications, Foundation Models, and the Path to Precision Cardiology

The role of AI-enhanced cardiovascular ultrasound in the transition from descriptive imaging toward predictive and personalized medicine is examined, with AI-enhanced cardiovascular ultrasound poised to become a central tool of precision cardiology.

Ancuța Elena Țupu, Simona Steliana Tudor, C. Dumitru et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Evaluation of artificial intelligence for pulmonary embolism detection on CTPA

AI-assisted CTPA interpretation was associated with higher lesion-level sensitivity and precision and shorter reading times than physician-only interpretation, and larger prospective multicenter studies are required to validate these findings and assess their generalizability.

Hui-Yang Zhang, Min-Jie Dong, Hong-Bo Li et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Open access Sep 2026

Diagnostic accuracy of AI-augmented renal ultrasound for degenerative kidney disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Introduction This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics applied to renal ultrasound for the diagnosis, staging, and prognosis of degenerative kidney disorders. Methods PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and gray-literature so...

M. Elhaie, Abolfazl Koozari, Amirsaman Soleimani Nasab et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.