Skip to content
Review

A Machine Learning and Large Language Model Tool for Systematic Literature Reviews of Health Economic Evidence: A Validation Study.

Jul 2026 · PharmacoEconomics (Auckland) · 0 citations · 33 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Artificial intelligence-driven tools performed well for title/abstract screening and general data extraction but were less accurate for full-text screening and interpretation of modeling choices.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Systematic Literature Reviews in Metabolic Phenotyping: A Methodological Framework and Validation Study

Systematic literature reviews are widely acknowledged to be at the top of most evidence hierarchies but are very time-consuming and labour-intensive. The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) offers possibilities to accelerate the review process. We propose a systematic literature review protocol that incorporates A...

Maartje Cox, Javier Osorio Mosquera, Shaimaa Khandaker et al. · 0 citations
#small language model Review Open access Aug 2026

Toward Automating the Selection of Articles Reporting EQ-5D Data for Systematic Literature Reviews Using Large Language Models: Algorithm Development and Evaluation Study

The models reproduced human screening tendencies despite the small dataset size, demonstrating the technical feasibility of LLM-assisted article selection and providing the first demonstration of LLM-assisted identification of EQ-5D data in biomedical literature.

Gábor Kertész, J. Czere, Z. Zrubka et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Future promise, current clinical ambiguity: a systematic review of machine learning algorithm outputs predicting risk of cardiovascular disease

Abstract Objective To examine whether the outputs of machine learning algorithms designed to predict risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) address known deficiencies of the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and improve risk estimates. Methods For this critical review, Medline, Embase and IEEE were searched from inception to 1...

S. Phillips, Han Han · 1 citation
Review Open access Sep 2026

Machine learning models for identifying prediabetes: a systematic review of performance, validation, and implications for primary care

Machine learning models have been proposed for identifying prediabetes, but their methodological quality, generalisability, and readiness for primary care implementation remain uncertain. We conducted a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020-compliant systematic revi...

Liang Wang, Yan Zhang, Hao Yang et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Large Language Models for Mental Health Prediction: Scoping Review of Bias and Clinical Utility Documentation in 2019-2024

Abstract Background A growing body of literature leverages large language models (LLMs) to make mental health predictions. However, these models are prone to bias, and studies to validate their clinical utility are lacking. Objective This scoping review aims to uncover bias and clinical utility limitations stemming fro...

Clémentine Bleuze, Karen Fort, Vincent P. Martin et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

A systematic review of artificial intelligence and machine learning for public health predictions using electronic health records in low and middle income countries with comparative benchmarks from high income settings

The growing availability of electronic health records (EHRs) has accelerated the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in public health. Yet, how well these methods work in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), remains poorly understood. This review synthesises studies on ML-based prediction...

Joe Phiri, Aaron Zimba, C. Njovu et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.