Skip to content
Review Open access

Use of single-item scales in the evaluation of German digital health applications (DiGAs): Scoping review protocol

Aug 2026 · PLoS ONE · Vol 21, pp. e0356485 - e0356485 · 0 citations · 18 references
Medicine

TL;DR

A transparent and reproducible approach to mapping outcome measurement practices in DiGAs is outlined, which will inform researchers, developers, and policymakers and support methodological development in regulated digital health contexts.

Abstract

Introduction German Digital Health Applications (DiGAs) are reimbursable, patient-facing digital interventions within the German healthcare system that must demonstrate positive healthcare effects. Outcome measurement in DiGA evaluations is influenced by both methodological considerations and feasibility requirements in real-world care settings. In practice, these evaluations may be affected by factors such as limited patient adherence, high dropout rates, and variability in real-world data quality, which can complicate outcome data collection. Single-item scales may offer a low-burden alternative to multi-item instruments; however, their use, justification, and limitations in DiGA evaluations have not been comprehensively mapped. This paper presents a scoping review protocol designed to address this gap. Methods and analysis This protocol outlines a scoping review that will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and be reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The review will apply the PCC framework, focusing on DiGAs listed in the BfArM DiGA directory, the use of single-item scales, and evaluations conducted within the German healthcare system. Studies will be identified primarily through the DiGA directory and supplemented by PubMed searches to verify and complete bibliographic information. Two reviewers will independently screen and verify extracted data. Quantitative data will be summarized descriptively, while qualitative information on constructs, rationales, and methodological considerations will be analyzed thematically. Results As this is a protocol, no results are reported. The planned review will provide a descriptive overview of single-item scale use in DiGA evaluations, map the constructs assessed, and identify methodological characteristics and gaps. Conclusion This protocol outlines a transparent and reproducible approach to mapping outcome measurement practices in DiGAs. The findings of the completed review will inform researchers, developers, and policymakers and support methodological development in regulated digital health contexts. Registration The scoping review protocol is registered at the Open Science Framework under the following DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/A3PM5.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Advancing foundational models in digital health technology adoption: A systematic literature review of multidisciplinary factors

Digital health technologies (DHTs) such as patient portals, mobile applications, and electronic health records can improve access to healthcare, self-management and care coordination. However, their adoption remains inconsistent. This study systematically reviews the technological, psychological, social, cultural, heal...

Huey-Yu Ng, Shamala Ramasamy, S. Muthaiyah et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Validating DigiHEALTHQUAL for measuring digital health effects on service quality in outpatient care in Germany

The adoption of digital health solutions (DHS) in outpatient care is hindered by uncertainty regarding their non-clinical effects and a lack of validated instruments for standardized evaluation. Health care service quality (HCSQ) provides a theoretically grounded framework for assessing these effects, but no validated...

Dominik Rigo, L. Fehring, A. Mortsiefer et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Digital therapeutics for depression in Germany: A systematic app review

DiGAs for depression differ substantially in their adherence to clinical guidelines, quality, and functional characteristics, highlighting the need for transparent and multidimensional evaluations to support informed clinical decision-making.

A. Schmitz, S. Frey, E. Treis-Hoffmann et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Process measures developed for the routine monitoring of low-value care with electronic health data: A scoping review

Greater taxonomy standardization, improved reporting transparency, and stronger alignment with quality improvement and behavioural change frameworks are needed to support systematic monitoring and subsequent reductions in LVC across healthcare systems.

Luc Saulnier, Daniele Franzoi, Anne Gulbech Ording et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

The Perspectives of DM Patients About Barriers to Using Digital Health Technology in Qualitative Study: A Systematic Review

Digital health technology (DHT) has been shown to increase the glycemic control index in Diabetes Mellitus (DM) patients. The application of DHT is associated with several barriers from the perspectives of patients, which must be addressed in further development. This systematic review aimed to identify barriers to usi...

Anita Kumala Hati, S. A. Kristina, N. Yasin et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Strengthening the patient perspective in quality development: a mixed-methods observational study on suitability of the PROMIS GH-10 in Swiss inpatient rehabilitation

Healthcare systems increasingly use patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to complement traditional clinical and performance-based outcomes by capturing health outcomes from the patient perspective and supporting quality improvement and patient-centred care. In Switzerland, the National competence centre for qualit...

M. Utsch, G. Brupbacher, G. Garuffi et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.