Are Water-Based Algorithms Still Adequate for Dose Calculation in Modern HDR Interventional Radiotherapy? A Review with Special Focus on 3D-Printed Applicators and Heterogeneous Materials
TL;DR
Model-based dose calculation algorithms provide greater dosimetric accuracy and should be progressively integrated into clinical practice, particularly in treatments involving significant heterogeneities, as is increasingly evident in modern personalized HDR IRT.
Abstract
Background: High-dose-rate interventional radiotherapy (HDR IRT) relies on accurate dose calculations to ensure safe and effective treatment. The AAPM TG-43 formalism, based on homogeneous water assumptions, has long been the clinical standard, but the growing use of patient-specific applicators and heterogeneous materials challenges its accuracy. Materials and Methods: A literature narrative review was performed using PubMed and Scopus to identify studies comparing TG-43 and model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs), including deterministic methods (ACE, Acuros BV) and Monte Carlo simulations. Thirty-five studies were selected and qualitatively analyzed. Results: TG-43 yielded higher dose compared with MBDCAs, particularly in the presence of tissue heterogeneities, air gaps, shielding materials, and limited scatter conditions. Differences ranged from 2 to 5% in relatively homogeneous settings to more than 10–20% in complex geometries such as superficial mould treatments and head-and-neck IRT. Model-based approaches showed better agreement with Monte Carlo simulations and experimental measurements, especially in contact HDR IRT and applications involving 3D-printed applicators. Conclusion: While TG-43 remains clinically established and widely used, its limitations are increasingly evident in modern personalized HDR IRT. Model-based dose calculation algorithms provide greater dosimetric accuracy and should be progressively integrated into clinical practice, particularly in treatments involving significant heterogeneities.