Skip to content
Open access

Psychological consequences of mammography screening recommendations: a prospective cohort study in Iran.

Jul 2026 · BMC Psychology · 0 citations
Medicine

TL;DR

The findings indicate that recommending mammography screening is accompanied by increased psychological consequence scores, particularly in emotional and social domains, and addressing the psychological aspects of screening may improve women's experiences within national screening programs.

Abstract

Background

AND

Purpose

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women. Despite advances in treatment, some women still present at advanced stages of the disease. Although mammography screening can improve survival through early detection, there is ongoing debate regarding its benefits and potential harms. This study aimed to investigate the psychological consequences of breast cancer screening and the factors associated with them.

Methods

This prospective cohort study was conducted in Iran and included 320 women aged 40-69 years who attended comprehensive health centers for gynecologic care and met the inclusion criteria. According to the eligibility criteria, women aged 35-69 years with a family history of breast cancer were also eligible; however, in practice, no participants younger than 40 years were enrolled. Participants were selected using convenience sampling, while health centers were chosen randomly. In total, ten centers from the northern and southern regions of the city were selected through simple random sampling by drawing lots. Participants were classified into two groups based on acceptance or refusal of mammography. Data were collected before and after the screening recommendation using a demographic and reproductive characteristics form and the Psychological Consequences Questionnaire (PCQ), which assesses emotional, social, and physical functioning. The reliability of the data collection tools was evaluated through a pilot study and calculation of Cronbach's alpha coefficients. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 18.

Results

Before the screening recommendation, there was no significant difference in psychological consequence scores between the two groups (p = 0.53). After the recommendation, the total psychological consequence score and the emotional and social functioning subscales were significantly higher in the acceptance group compared with the refusal group (p < 0.05). The mean difference in total psychological consequence scores between the two groups was 0.82. In the acceptance group, total psychological consequence scores increased significantly after the screening recommendation (p < 0.001). Psychological consequences were inversely associated with age and income (p < 0.05); however, no significant associations were found with education level or number of children.

Conclusion

The findings indicate that recommending mammography screening is accompanied by increased psychological consequence scores, particularly in emotional and social domains. Age and income were identified as factors associated with psychological consequences. These results suggest that the screening process may elicit considerable psychological responses among women. Therefore, future interventional studies are recommended to evaluate the effects of educational and psychological support programs prior to screening on mitigating these consequences. From a public health policy perspective, addressing the psychological aspects of screening may improve women's experiences within national screening programs.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Assessment of Community Awareness of Breast Cancer Screening Among Asymptomatic Adults as a Strategy for Risk Reduction and Early Detection

Despite high awareness of breast cancer, important gaps in knowledge of risk factors and barriers to screening remain and targeted health education and improved access to affordable screening services are needed to promote early detection and increase breast cancer screening uptake.

L. Daniel, L. Olatunji, Ganabuto Kadabiyu Jones et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access 2026

Factors Affecting Participation in Breast Cancer Screening: A Cross-sectional Study

Objectives: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women; early detection through screening improves survival. This study aimed to compare patients diagnosed through screening with those diagnosed outside screening programs to identify factors influencing participation in breast cancer screening. Methods: A tot...

Safiye Kübra Çetindağ Karatlı, Salih Karatlı · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Prevalence And Barriers To Mammography Screening Among Healthcare Personnel In Al-Hillah City: A Study On Awareness And Practice

Background: Breast cancer is a leading cause of female mortality worldwide. Despite Iraq offering a free national breast cancer screening program, participation rates in the community remain low. The participation of female healthcare workers, who are key to promoting this program also questionable. Objective: To asses...

Miasm Mohsin Ali, H. Hameed · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Determinants of mammography screening uptake among women attending family health centers in Ankara, Türkiye: a cross-sectional study

This study aimed to assess sociodemographic characteristics, health-seeking behaviors, and breast cancer screening beliefs among women aged 18–69 years attending Family Health Centers (FHCs) in Ankara, Türkiye, and to determine predictors of participation in mammography screening. It is design as a descriptive, cross-s...

F. B. Topcu, S. Çetintepe, Caner Baysan et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

An analysis of acceptance, socioeconomic factors, and outcome of skin cancer screening among the cohort of the Gutenberg Health Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Given the increasing incidence of cutaneous neoplasms, the nationwide skin cancer screening program was implemented in Germany in 2008. However, there are few studies evaluating its effectiveness. The aim of this analysis was to assess factors influencing participation and outcomes of skin can...

Maike Kaufhold, H. Stege, Stephan Grabbe et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.