Jul 2026· 2026 ITU Kaleidoscope - AI and Frontier Technologies for Good (ITU K)· pp. 1-5· 0 citations
Abstract
Article examines global governance of AI as an emerging polycentric system formed largely through soft-law instruments, technical standards, and institutional coordination mechanisms. It advances the concept of soft polycentricity to describe a governance condition in which multiple centers of rule-making possess practical authority but lack a binding hierarchy or stable coordination procedures. The study compares major regulatory approaches and assesses the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) as a nodal institution whose comparative advantage lies in technical standardsetting, multistakeholder convening, and capacity-building. The article also evaluates the structural limits of ITU authority, including mandate boundaries, geopolitical contestation, resource constraints, and possible institutional competition within the United Nations system. It argues that ITU should not be treated as a universal AI regulator, but as one pillar of a distributed UN-centered architecture capable of reducing fragmentation through standards coordination, capacity development, and procedural integration. The conclusion proposes measurable implementation steps for enhancing UN coordination in AI governance while preserving institutional specialization.
It is argued that a layered subsidiarity approach, with specific financing for capacity-building and technical standards that work across the board, is more likely to deliver effective global AI governance than calls for a binding treaty.
Asher Odhiambo Ojuok, Julius Murumba, E. Micheni· East African Journal of Info...· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence presents an unusually difficult problem for global governance. The technology develops rapidly, crosses borders easily, and is shaped by actors whose resources and capabilities may rival those of states. Yet international responses remain fragmented, unevenly representative, and overwhelmingly n...
Artificial intelligence governance is often discussed as if it were a single global policy domain. In practice, governments confront a coordination problem across partially overlapping agendas pursued through different instruments and actor configurations. This research note conceptualizes global AI governance as a n...
This Policy and Practice Review concludes that AI-enabled administration remains legitimate only where public authorities retain the capacity to understand, justify, correct, suspend and democratically control the systems they use.
A. Dragomir, Iulea Bulea, Lucian Tarnu· Frontiers in Political Scien...· 2 citations
This article interrogates the concept of artificial intelligence (AI) sovereignty as an emerging site of normative tension within international law. As states increasingly assert jurisdiction over AI technologies and digital infrastructures, established doctrines, particularly those concerning territoriality, jurisdi...
A. Yadav· Asian journal of Law and Soc...· 0 citations
Azerbaijan is moving from a general digital-development policy toward a distinct but still fragmented legal and institutional framework for artificial intelligence (AI). This article examines that transition through doctrinal legal research and functional comparative analysis. It evaluates constitutional and personal-d...
Natig Khalilov· Law and World· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.