Skip to content

Artificial Intelligence Governance at the Global Level: Policy, Standards and Institutional Design

Jul 2026 · 2026 ITU Kaleidoscope - AI and Frontier Technologies for Good (ITU K) · pp. 1-5 · 0 citations

Abstract

Article examines global governance of AI as an emerging polycentric system formed largely through soft-law instruments, technical standards, and institutional coordination mechanisms. It advances the concept of soft polycentricity to describe a governance condition in which multiple centers of rule-making possess practical authority but lack a binding hierarchy or stable coordination procedures. The study compares major regulatory approaches and assesses the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) as a nodal institution whose comparative advantage lies in technical standardsetting, multistakeholder convening, and capacity-building. The article also evaluates the structural limits of ITU authority, including mandate boundaries, geopolitical contestation, resource constraints, and possible institutional competition within the United Nations system. It argues that ITU should not be treated as a universal AI regulator, but as one pillar of a distributed UN-centered architecture capable of reducing fragmentation through standards coordination, capacity development, and procedural integration. The conclusion proposes measurable implementation steps for enhancing UN coordination in AI governance while preserving institutional specialization.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Governing Artificial Intelligence in a Fragmented World: Toward a Multi-Level Policy Framework for Global AI Governance

It is argued that a layered subsidiarity approach, with specific financing for capacity-building and technical standards that work across the board, is more likely to deliver effective global AI governance than calls for a binding treaty.

Asher Odhiambo Ojuok, Julius Murumba, E. Micheni · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Oct 2026

Architecture Without an Architect? Global Governance of Artificial Intelligence in a Divided World

Artificial intelligence presents an unusually difficult problem for global governance. The technology develops rapidly, crosses borders easily, and is shaped by actors whose resources and capabilities may rival those of states. Yet international responses remain fragmented, unevenly representative, and overwhelmingly n...

Simon Chesterman · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Coordinating fragmented global AI governance: Control, Rights, and Safety as a regime complex

Artificial intelligence governance is often discussed as if it were a single global policy domain. In practice, governments confront a coordination problem across partially overlapping agendas pursued through different instruments and actor configurations. This research note conceptualizes global AI governance as a n...

Hana Kim · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Human-centric AI governance in the European Union. Accountability, fundamental rights, and institutional resilience in public administration

This Policy and Practice Review concludes that AI-enabled administration remains legitimate only where public authorities retain the capacity to understand, justify, correct, suspend and democratically control the systems they use.

A. Dragomir, Iulea Bulea, Lucian Tarnu · 2 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Algorithmic Governance and International Law: Reconciling Sovereignty and Cross-Border Accountability

This article interrogates the concept of artificial intelligence (AI) sovereignty as an emerging site of normative tension within international law. As states increasingly assert jurisdiction over AI technologies and digital infrastructures, established doctrines, particularly those concerning territoriality, jurisdi...

A. Yadav · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

The Emerging Law of Artificial Intelligence in Azerbaijan: Between National Strategy and European Regulatory Frameworks

Azerbaijan is moving from a general digital-development policy toward a distinct but still fragmented legal and institutional framework for artificial intelligence (AI). This article examines that transition through doctrinal legal research and functional comparative analysis. It evaluates constitutional and personal-d...

Natig Khalilov · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.