Skip to content
Open access

Towards a Typology of Positive Polarity Focus Constructions

Jul 2026 · Suvremena Lingvistika · Vol 52, pp. 121-152 · 0 citations · 51 references

Abstract

This paper explores the cross-linguistic diversity of grammatical ways of encoding positive polarity focus in declaratives, termed polarity focus constructions. In addition, the paper attempts to address the question if such constructions cross-linguistically commonly target finite verb forms. A 20-language convenience sample was used for the study, spanning 10 language families from six geographic areas of the world: the Ethiopian Highlands, Europe, Mesoamerica, the Northwestern Coast of North America, Siberia and West Africa. The data were primarily collected from secondary sources. The investigation has confirmed all the structural types of polarity focus marking noted in previous work touching on the cross-linguistic structural diversity in polarity focus marking: prosodic prominence on the finite verb form, special syntactic positioning of the finite verb form, special morphemes and auxiliary verbs. What is more, it has attested to structural elements in polarity focus marking not mentioned in previous cross-linguistic work. One instance of these are special subject-agreement suffixes on the verb in Bench (Ta-Ne-Omotic, Ethiopian Highlands). Another instance is absence of structural elements that occur in canonical wide predicate-focus declaratives. This pattern was found in Bench and Somali (Afro-Asiatic, Cushitic, Ethiopian Highlands). In addition, all three pairs of languages within the same genus that are included in the dataset feature completely different polarity focus constructions: Bura-Pabir and Marghi South (Afro-Asiatic, Chadic, Bura-Marghi), English and Swedish (Indo-European, Germanic), and Croatian and Russian (Indo-European, Slavic). This suggests that polarity focus constructions might be a diachronically unstable feature. Finally, the polarity focus constructions in 16 of the 20 languages can be analysed as marking the finite verb form as the focus domain, with the data lacking for the remaining four languages. This suggests that the finite verb form as the syntactic domain of polarity focus may be a cross-linguistically common pattern.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Bridging constructions in Sino-Tibetan languages

Abstract This article presents the first systematic typological survey of bridging constructions in the Sino-Tibetan language family. Bridging constructions are discourse-linking devices in which material from a preceding clause is repeated or summarized at the onset of a following sentence, thereby contributing to coh...

Katia Chirkova, Hong-Di Ding, P. van Els · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Word Order Variation and Focus Marking in Jordanian Arabic: A Syntax–Pragmatics Interface Study

This article examines the relationship between word order variation and focus marking in Jordanian Arabic (JA) from the perspective of the syntax-pragmatics interface. Drawing on a corpus of naturalistic conversations, semi-structured interviews, and written dialectal texts, the study investigates how JA speakers explo...

Mohammad Habes Eid Al Khaza'lah, Saddam H. M. Issa, T. Jayakumar · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

A Typologically-Informed Methodology for Contrastive Analysis of Verbo-Nominal Predicative Collocations in Divergent Language Systems

The article addresses the problem of crosslinguistic comparison of verbo-nominal stable collocations that occupy an intermediate position between free word combinations and phraseological units. The material includes scholarly works on contrastive linguistics and studies of these constructions in Germanic studies and R...

I. V. Boguslavskaya · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

From formulaic collective address to plural pronoun

This paper examines a little-known composite second-person plural pronoun that has received no systematic attention in the historical-linguistic literature to date: among(st)-you . Drawing on a broad range of textual sources, we first map the geographical distribution of this pronoun across the anglophone world...

Bart Jacobs, S. Goyette, Mikael Parkvall · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Affirmative markers: A cross-linguistic study of overspecification

Based on a worldwide sample of 604 languages from 179 families, this study shows that affirmative markers, the functional opposite of standard negators, are highly infrequent and possibly ‘rara.’ This confirms previous impressionistic claims. Nine languages with one affirmative marker each were found. Their geographica...

Tim Zingler · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Linguistic Typology: A Critical Review of Metacoding and Syntactic Structure across Languages

Linguistic typology seeks to describe the structural diversity of the world's languages and to explain the recurrent patterns, or universals, that constrain this diversity. A central but often under-examined concept within this enterprise is metacoding: the principled allocation of formal marking resources, such as cas...

Sun Jiaze, Mulyadi, Khairina et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.