Skip to content
#data science Open access

Digital technologies, social appropriation of knowledge and food security: a scoping review with best-fit framework synthesis

Nov 2026 · Open Science Framework
Agricultural Innovations and Practices

Abstract

This scoping review maps how digital technologies applied to food security (remote sensing, Internet of Things, artificial intelligence, mobile and digital platforms, decision support systems, blockchain and digital traceability) engage with the social appropriation of knowledge, understood as the participatory processes through which communities and territories exchange, adapt and use scientific and technological knowledge. The review follows the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and will be reported according to PRISMA-ScR and PRISMA-S. Stream A (systematic mapping) searches Scopus and the Web of Science Core Collection for primary studies published from 2020 onwards in which a digital technology is the object of study and food security, or at least one of its pillars (availability, access, utilisation, stability), is an explicit aim or outcome. Records will be screened with ASReview using active learning and a pre-specified stopping rule, with a second reviewer verifying a random sample of at least 20% of decisions, following the Cochrane rapid review guidance. Data will be charted from full texts with a piloted form. Stream B (conceptual sources) is a purposive selection of literature on social appropriation of knowledge, science communication, co-design and agricultural innovation systems, used to build an a priori framework. Expected outcomes: (1) an evidence map of technologies, food-security pillars and levels of social appropriation; (2) a synthesis of barriers and enabling conditions for adoption and appropriation; and (3) a conceptual framework, derived through best-fit framework synthesis, that articulates technology, social appropriation, governance and food-security outcomes, together with testable propositions for subsequent empirical research. The full protocol is attached.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.