Aug 2026· Frontiers in Psychiatry· Vol 17· 0 citations· 47 references
Medicine
TL;DR
A standardized facts label for AI-DMHTs is proposed designed to enhance transparency and awareness about these tools and their risks to users, patients, and clinicians and serves as a foundation for continued multidisciplinary collaboration regarding the development and governance of AI risk communication in the domain of mental health and healthcare more broadly.
Abstract
With interest in the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled digital mental health technologies (AI-DMHTs) among the general population ceaselessly escalating, mental health clinicians are obliged to confront questions about their utility and safety for their practice. However, little guidance exists for developers on how to communicate risks to clinicians who may need to evaluate products for individuals with mental health concerns, individuals who are frequently vulnerable to such risks. We propose a standardized facts label for AI-DMHTs designed to enhance transparency and awareness about these tools and their risks to users, patients, and clinicians. This framework was developed by a multidisciplinary team from the American Psychiatric Association Committee on Mental Health Information Technology through iterative expert review and external clinician consultation, drawing upon existing scholarship in risk communication and informed consent, as well as international AI governance frameworks. The resulting facts label framework is composed of 8 sections: key identifying information, intended use, warnings, risks and limitations, model information, clinical evidence, accessibility and usability considerations, and privacy and security. This research represents a practical step toward responsible utilization of AI-DMHTs and aims to serve as a foundation for continued multidisciplinary collaboration regarding the development and governance of AI risk communication in the domain of mental health and healthcare more broadly.
This review provides a clinician-centered understanding of AI adoption, highlighting that acceptability depends not only on what AI can do but also on whether it can be integrated safely, ethically, and in ways that preserve professional judgment and therapeutic relationships.
Carly Hudson, Thuy Linh Phan, Marcus Randall· Journal of Medical Internet...· 0 citations
This work examines current AI applications in public health through the lens of established ethical principles, with particular attention to historically marginalized communities, and proposes concrete strategies, including mandatory equity impact assessments, validation in the communities of intended use, and sustaine...
T. Adirim, Amy Molten· American Journal of Public H...· 0 citations
This article shows how the Technology Acceptance Model and Technology Trust are combined in the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and how the Perceived Empathy Model (PEM) and Perceived Clarity of Accountability Model (PCA) are extensions of these models.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming mental health care by enabling novel approaches to assessment, outcome prediction, and treatment. However, the rapid growth of AI tools has outpaced evidence synthesis on their realworld clinical value, implementation barriers, and ethical risks, leaving clinicians and p...
Shizal Nawaz, Laiba Nawaz, Hasnain Ali et al.· Digital Medicine· 0 citations
This scoping review aims to systematically map the harms which may arise from engaging with AI for mental health support, as formulated in the academic literature, regulatory frameworks, grey literature, and practitioner guidance, to inform the co-production of a harm taxonomy.
X. Hunt, A. G. Mokaya, Sara Zannone et al.· Wellcome Open Research· 0 citations
The paper argues that AI may assist in delivering mental healthcare, but technological capability cannot be equated with ethical responsibility, and proposes the HUMAN AI Framework, centred on Human Oversight, Understanding and Informed Consent, Mental Health Data Protection, Accountability, Non Discrimination, Assessm...
D. Jahagirdar, Sanskruti Tare· International Journal of Lat...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.