Skip to content
Open access

Efficacy of two programmed cell death 1 combination regimens in recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck carcinoma: A real-world retrospective study

Sep 2026 · World Journal of Clinical Oncology · 0 citations · 18 references

Abstract

Background

The combination of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors with molecularly targeted agents, including anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody (cetuximab) and multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (such as anlotinib), has emerged as promising therapeutic strategies in recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). However, comparisons of efficacy between the dual-agent regimens remain unexplored.

Aim

To evaluate the comparative survival benefits and treatment responses of PD-1 inhibitor plus cetuximab vs PD-1 inhibitor plus anlotinib in R/M HNSCC.

Methods

In this real-world study, 24 patients who received PD-1 inhibitors combined with targeted agents at Peking University Cancer Hospital between November 2018 and May 2024 were retrospectively assessed. Patients were stratified into two groups: Anti-PD-1 plus cetuximab (n = 13) and anti-PD-1 plus anlotinib (n = 11). Clinical characteristics and follow-up outcomes were collected, and the overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) of the two strategies were analyzed.

Results

The anti-PD-1 plus cetuximab group achieved an ORR of 27.3% and a DCR of 90.9%, while the anti-PD-1 plus anlotinib group showed an ORR of 40.0% and a DCR of 100%. The anti-PD-1 plus cetuximab group demonstrated significantly prolonged OS compared to the anti-PD-1 plus anlotinib group (19.2 months vs 5.8 months; hazard ratios = 0.37; P = 0.036). Survival benefits were consistently observed in subgroups, including patients with programmed death-ligand 1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 20 (29.7 months vs 4.1 months; P = 0.013), CPS ≥ 1 (29.7 months vs 4.1 months; P = 0.034), and those receiving first-line treatment (29.7 months vs 4.4 months; P = 0.024). PFS differences were not statistically significant (6.5 months vs 4.4 months, P = 0.448).

Conclusion

Both combination strategies showed antitumor activity in R/M HNSCC. In this retrospective real-world cohort, PD-1 inhibitor plus cetuximab was associated with prolonged OS, whereas PD-1 inhibitor plus anlotinib showed favorable disease control. Larger prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.