The detector, LatAD, jointly learns a latent and a Gaussian-mixture clustering of these regimes (VaDE) and scores anomalies by density rather than reconstruction, factorizing that density over correlation-community subsystems and combining per-community surprises by a cohesion-weighted, sparsity-adaptive statistic.
Abstract
A cyber-physical system (CPS) can enter a faulty state that is individually normal on every sensor and reconstructs accurately, yet is improbable under normal joint operation. This exposes the central weakness of reconstruction-based detection: reconstruction measures whether a state can be reproduced (reachability), not whether normal operation is likely to occupy it (probability). We model CPS normal behavior as a union of many imbalanced operating regimes, ten assumptions we call Massive, Implicit, Imbalanced Multimodality (MIIM). Our detector, LatAD, jointly learns a latent and a Gaussian-mixture clustering of these regimes (VaDE) and scores anomalies by density rather than reconstruction. Because a CPS is an assembly of coupled subsystems, we factorize that density over correlation-community subsystems and combine per-community surprises by a cohesion-weighted, sparsity-adaptive statistic, concentrating a local fault a global density dilutes. Evaluated with raw point-wise metrics and a difficulty split isolating the stealthy faults a per-channel threshold misses, LatAD attains the best AUROC on three real CPS benchmarks (WADI 0.862, HAI 0.949, SWaT 0.993) and leads the difficult subset of all three, notably on HAI (0.849; a significant +0.09 over the next-best baseline, 95% CI [0.046, 0.160]); the reconstruction-based USAD and TranAD fall to 0.30-0.48 on these reconstructable-but-improbable faults.
DPR-GM (Domain-Prior-Regularized Graph Modeling), a forecasting-based framework that incorporates system design knowledge into graph construction, is proposed, showing that domain-structured graph priors are a practical alternative to fully learned topologies in data-scarce CPS.
Youngseok Hwang, Joonsung Kwon, Geonwoo Lee et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
Evaluating five CPS anomaly detector methods across three CPS benchmarks shows that detection failure can come from different sources: a weak representation, poor threshold calibration, or an attack with little physical effect.
Pei-Ran Shi, Jian Xiang, Xiang Zhang et al.· 0 citations
This work formalizes the problem, identifies five intrinsic characteristics underlying its core challenges, and organizes prior work into two complementary paradigms, which sharpens decision boundaries through coarse-grained, structural, and semantic anomaly injection.
Xu-Dong Mou, Ze-Xin Wu, Chuan Luo et al.· 0 citations
CMR-Mamba is proposed, which trains per domain Mamba state-space encoders on healthy data and offers an interpretable and consistently competitive approach to coupling-fault detection across mechanical, hydraulic and cyber-physical systems.
Dhiraj Neupane, Mohamed Reda Bouadjenek, Richard Dazeley et al.· 0 citations
LLM-Detector is proposed, a framework that utilizes the in-context learning capacity of LLMs for structured, prompt-conditioned scoring synthesis, enabling LLMs to derive anomaly detection logic from structured normal-state knowledge.
Tu Nguyen, Dang Nguyen, T. D. Le et al.· 0 citations
CARE, a model-agnostic cascaded inference framework that integrates a Lightweight Pre-filter Model (LPM) with an existing high-capacity Complex Detection Model (CDM) and introduces a Structure Attention module to explicitly capture channel-wise anomaly contributions, achieves inference speedup compared to the most accu...
Zemin Chao, Qian Xu, Jian-He Cen et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.