It is argued that the central economic transformation is not simply digitization, but a deeper pivot from the production of goods and knowledge toward the valuation of data generated through those production processes, and that middle powers must develop the state as a platform.
Abstract
Abstract This article examines the future of the world economy from the standpoint of middle powers, with particular attention to Canada in the wake of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s renewed emphasis on middle-power coordination. It argues that the central economic transformation is not simply digitization, but a deeper pivot from the production of goods and knowledge toward the valuation of data generated through those production processes. Agriculture, manufacturing, health, education, logistics, and public administration are increasingly organized around data capture, platform intermediation, and AI-enabled recombination. This shift intensifies economies of scale, network effects, and economies of scope, thereby concentrating economic power in a small group of multinational technology firms. For middle powers, the resulting challenge is not to reject global platforms, but to avoid operational dependency on them. The article advances digital sovereignty as a framework based on control, interoperability, public-interest data governance, sovereign compute, and contestable digital markets. It concludes that middle powers must develop the state as a platform: a provider of trusted digital foundations that can sustain innovation, democratic accountability, and strategic autonomy in an increasingly platformized world economy.
The paper contributes a Digital Leapfrogging Readiness framework organised around four interdependent conditions — infrastructural, institutional, capability and content conditions — and derives five strategic imperatives for firms competing in these markets.
Deesha Sarmah· International journal of res...· 0 citations
ABSTRACT The EU’s Global Gateway initiative is framed as a global infrastructure package. Through a comparative analysis of four flagship projects, we argue it depends structurally on autonomous corporate actors. State-centric theories that treat firms as mere instruments of statecraft cannot account for this dependenc...
Luís Pais Bernardo, Luis Mah· Journal of European Integrat...· 3 citations
India’s fragmented regulatory architecture, spanning competition law, intermediary regulation, data governance, and sector-specific controls, produces overlapping and sometimes contradictory legal classifications of Big Tech firms, generating a parallax effect within law itself, enabling both regulatory discretion and...
Pratiksha Ashok· National Law School Business...· 0 citations
Since the mid-2000s, online labor platforms (OLPs) have emerged as vehicles for economic imperialism in the digitally deliverable services sector. By providing capital with instant access to inexpensive digital labor in the periphery, OLPs enable global North firms to bypass the costs associated with foreign direct...
Zachary Sedefian· Journal of Labor and Society· 0 citations
The article traces four contradictions: the commodification of unpaid user activity, the material basis of immaterial production, the concentration of market power, the gap between participation and algorithmic control, and the gap between participation and algorithmic control.
Murad Karaduman, M. A. Arık, Sibel Karaduman· Journalism and Media· 0 citations
This blog argues that, in India, this pursuit of digital sovereignty makes accountability more difficult, and explores the increasing reliance on voluntary, industry-led AI governance frameworks in place of binding regulation, and the expanding role of private actors in functions traditionally associated with the state...
Harleen Kaur· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.