Skip to content
Review

Functional and body composition outcomes of pharmacological interventions for sarcopenia in older adults: A systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Nov 2026 · Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental · pp. 156820 · 0 citations · 66 references
Medicine

Abstract

Background

&

Aims

Pharmacological trials in sarcopenia have reported changes in muscle mass or selected functional measures, but the consistency and clinical importance of these effects remain uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults aged ≥65 years.

Methods

The original review search used MEDLINE and Embase from inception to 9 February 2026. CLINICALTRIALS gov was checked immediately after completion of the systematic review. Interventions were analyzed within four broad therapeutic Groups and complementary pharmacological Classes. Random-effects pairwise meta-analyses used mean differences (MDs) for functional outcomes and Hedges' g standardized mean differences (SMDs) for body-composition outcomes.

Results

Twenty-six RCTs including 3237 participants were included. At the Group level, Hormonal and anabolic therapies showed small pooled differences in grip strength (MD 1.003 kg, 95% CI 0.007 to 2.000) and 6-minute walk distance (MD 12.335 m, 95% CI 5.043 to 19.627). Myostatin inhibitors showed a gait-speed difference of 0.0300 m/s (95% CI 0.0295 to 0.0305) and a single-study estimate for appendicular lean body mass (SMD 0.573, 95% CI 0.291 to 0.855). The functional differences were below commonly cited meaningful-change benchmarks. Class-level evidence was sparse, with several Classes represented by one trial. Functional estimates for RAAS-based and Metabolic therapies were based on few trials and varied across outcomes.

Conclusion

Functional and body-composition estimates varied across therapeutic Groups and Classes. The observed functional differences were small relative to commonly cited benchmarks, and Class-level evidence was sparse. Future trials should prioritize durable mobility, independence, and safety outcomes.

View source

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.