Skip to content

TreeCCA: Canonical Correlation Analysis via Gradient-Boosted Trees

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.27027 · 0 citations · 32 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

TreeCCA is the first CCA method to combine nonlinear accuracy with native interpretability: every tree split selects one feature, so gain importances reveal which inputs drive cross-view correlation at no extra cost.

Abstract

Gradient-boosted trees dominate tabular machine learning, yet canonical correlation analysis has always relied on linear or neural encoders. We propose \textbf{TreeCCA}, the first method to train gradient-boosted tree ensembles end-to-end as CCA encoders, inheriting their plug-and-play reliability: no architecture design, familiar hyperparameters, and strong performance with defaults. The technical enabler is the Eckart-Young (EY) loss, which supplies closed-form per-sample gradients that slot directly into any standard GBT library (XGBoost, LightGBM) as a custom objective. TreeCCA is the first CCA method to combine nonlinear accuracy with native interpretability: every tree split selects one feature, so gain importances reveal which inputs drive cross-view correlation at no extra cost. We demonstrate these properties on synthetic benchmarks, where TreeCCA matches or exceeds Deep CCA (2.61 vs.\ 2.43 on Signed Power; 2.93 vs.\ 2.89 on Hermite), and on a sparse benchmark with zero linear cross-view covariance, where TreeCCA recovers the true support with $\text{Precision@}S = 1.00$ at $p=50$ while PMD finds no signal. On the UCI HAR sensor-fusion benchmark, TreeCCA achieves comparable accuracy to Deep CCA at $5\times$ lower cost, while XGBoost gain importances directly validate a physics-motivated hypothesis about the data --- an interpretation not readily available with neural encoders. Across five popular tabular multi-view datasets, TreeMCCA consistently matches or exceeds linear CCA in both nonlinear correlation extraction and downstream classification accuracy.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

On the Principles Behind Neural Network Optimizers

This thesis develops a principled grounding for Adam and motivates new designs, and reveals new local structures in matrix-based nonconvex problems, and helps understand and improve recent NN optimizers, such as Muon.

Yu-Shun Zhang · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

TICDA: Tabular In-Context Data Attribution

Tabular foundation models (TFMs) achieve strong predictive performance by conditioning on labeled demonstrations provided in context, without any parameter update. Yet how individual demonstrations shape a given prediction remains poorly understood. This gap matters in practice: the context is often assembled from what...

Yacine Benihaddadene, Milan Bhan, Eliot Dugelay et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

LILA: Calibration-Free Structured Pruning of Large Language Models via Latent Spectral Geometry

Extending LILA to dynamically allocate sparsity budgets via KS-scores yields state-of-the-art generative preservation at moderate compression, while uncovering fundamental single-layer architectural bottlenecks at higher compression regimes.

Sankar Behera, Dhruv Singh, Anshika Agnihotri et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Online Supervised Dimension Reduction with Random Features: Diagnostics and Computational Trade-offs

Diagnostics limit explanations based solely on terminal optimization accuracy and distinguish numerical cost from quality, rank coverage and freshness; they establish neither practical-tracker convergence nor predictive or deployment benefits from basis availability.

Zhen-Lin Yao, Wei Xiong · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Aug 2026

Blog: Survey of Optimizers

This survey organizes recent optimizers and training optimization methods along four largely independent axes: temporal estimation, update geometry, horizon management, and representation and systems.

Ruo-Ran Xu · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Beyond the Matrix Sign: Quadratic Spectral Descent

Muon emerges as a strong competitor of the AdamW for LLM pretraining, because the matrix-wise update it employs can potentially incur smaller second-order penalty than the once dominating AdamW, which performs coordinate-wise update. However, the spectral flattening procedure in Muon is quite debatable since it discard...

Qiao-Zhe Zhang, Jun Sun, Ying-Zhuang Liu · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.