Aug 2026· Journal of Surgical Research· Vol 326, pp.
702-709
· 0 citations· 17 references
Medicine
TL;DR
There is greater potential to ensure that QI can provide access to high-quality care for all individuals by collaboratively learning from these challenges and sharing the paths they identified to move forward.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
While health-care quality improvement (QI) initiatives have improved health outcomes, these benefits are not accessible to all patients. Currently, there is no clear roadmap for implementing QI to address health inequities. Therefore, we studied the experiences of collaborative quality improvement (CQI) leaders who leverage QI to address health inequities.
Methods
We conducted semi-structured group and individual interviews with 25 leaders from 12 CQI coordinating centers in Michigan between May and August 2025. Participants were asked about their current QI initiatives that seek to explore or mitigate the impact of nonmedical drivers of health outcome variability. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and deidentified. Data were analyzed using a combination of deductive and inductive content analysis, followed by a secondary matrix analysis.
Results
Participants identified challenges and opportunities in conducting QI to evaluate gaps and ensure access to quality care across three major themes. First, data points and variables that assess nonmedical drivers of care were often missing or lacked standardization. Second, CQIs and hospitals had an inconsistent understanding of health equity. Lastly, patients and hospitals had variable access to resources that could help to address gaps in access and improve quality.
Conclusions
In this study, CQI leaders identified common challenges that affect their ability to ensure that their QI efforts are accessible and effective for all patients. By collaboratively learning from these challenges and sharing the paths they identified to move forward, there is greater potential to ensure that QI can provide access to high-quality care for all individuals.
It is suggested that perceived barriers were largely modifiable while perceived facilitators were immutable and integral to the institution, which would facilitate dashboard implementation and evaluate dashboard implementation on patients’ transplant access.
Rachel C. Forbes, Marissa C. Kuo, M. Frazee et al.· Frontiers in Transplantation· 0 citations
Focus groups conducted with Canadian IA HCPs to explore their experiences, values, and preferences regarding the timing, modality, and nature of IA healthcare visits underscore the importance of flexible, integrated, and patient-centered approaches to meet diverse needs, support whole person care, and reduce the burden...
Nadia Deville-Stoetzel, Emilie McGuire, Kayli Raptis et al.· Journal of Rheumatology· 0 citations
Although school-partnered interventions were viewed favorably, scalability and sustainability were concerns, and further research is needed to test implementation strategies that can overcome barriers and augment evidence-based care.
Christine A. March, Alissa Guarneri, Dhruvi Vora et al.· Diabetes Obesity and Cardiom...· 0 citations
A relationship-centered, staged, and tailored approach can improve quality performance in independent practices despite structural constraints and provides a scalable framework for integrated delivery networks to drive performance across both employed and independent settings.
Nancy Maulick, J. Stoeckle, Wayne Stephens et al.· Population health management· 0 citations
This study aimed to better understand healthcare leaders’ perspectives on building cross-sector collaborations to support integration, and identified several primers for integration to better inform next steps forward.
Grace Liu, Peter Tsasis· Frontiers in Political Scien...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.