Jul 2026· International Symposium on Search Based Software Engineering· pp. 128-134· 0 citations· 8 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
This work classifies 1,254 performance-relevant diff hunks from 216 agent PRs, spanning five agent systems, against the 18-category syntactic mutation taxonomy of Even-Mendoza et al. (2025) using a dual-LLM intersection pipeline.
Abstract
AI coding agents are black boxes: we cannot inspect how they generate code, but we can inspect what they change. This distinction matters for search-based software engineering (SBSE), where techniques such as genetic improvement (in the performance-optimisation application we study) depend on mutation operators that reflect how code is actually transformed. Fewer than 1% of the 33,596 agent PRs in AIDev-pop target performance, making each case a rare window into otherwise opaque agent behaviour. We classify 1,254 performance-relevant diff hunks from 216 of these PRs, spanning five agent systems, against the 18-category syntactic mutation taxonomy of Even-Mendoza et al. (2025) using a dual-LLM intersection pipeline. Three categories dominate: name modification (37.0%), object creation (26.4%), and type change (22.7%), a profile markedly different from prior GI corpora where no change accounted for 84%. Each agent's deployed system commits to a distinctive mutation vocabulary, and each performance strategy activates a largely disjoint category subset. Agent identity and target strategy are therefore informative priors that narrow the effective SBSE operator space. Replication package: https://github.com/5uper6rain/ssbse-challenge-2026
With the advances of coding agents, software developers are spending more time reviewing code than writing code. As human review velocity falls behind agentic code generation, it is tempting to build automated review agents towards a future of"lights-off"software factory with little to no human supervision. To assess t...
Chenyang Yang, Hao He, Ti-Chung Cheng et al.· 0 citations
Software performance optimization requires identifying bottlenecks and improvement opportunities, and empirically evaluating the effects and trade-offs across performance objectives. Autonomous AI coding agents submit performance-oriented pull requests (PRs) to open-source projects, yet it remains unclear whether these...
Hui-Yun Peng, Ricardo Calvo, Kelechi G. Kalu et al.· 0 citations
It is shown that test suites generated by the spec-driven agent are superior to the baseline and human-authored tests in 77.8% and 56.7% of the cases, respectively, and demonstrated improvements on following best practices, readability, and edge-case coverage.
Michele Tufano, James McClure, José Cambronero et al.· Proceedings of the 1st Inter...· 0 citations
This work introduces a random variant sampler that applies common semantics-preserving transformations (SPTs) - spanning control-flow rewrites, dead-code injection, and identifier renaming - to produce perturbed variants, demonstrating that even top frontier models are susceptible to semantics-preserving perturbations.
Hasan Mahmud, Shreya Gupta, Isha Chaudhary et al.· 3 citations
This paper studies 37,623 provenance-labeled pull requests from five commercial agents and combines the AIDev dataset with 58,792 cached GitHub API responses to measure security smells in added code, structural maintainability, post-merge churn, revert rates, and human review behavior.
SWE Refactor Bench is introduced, a benchmark comprising 20 whole-repository migrations, covering 4 kinds of technical debt, and SWE Refactor Bench is positioned as a rigorous testbed for developing coding agents for reliable whole-repository migrations.
De-Yao Hong, Yi-Zhe Chi, Wen-Yi Li et al.· 4 citations· ⚡2
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.