Skip to content
Review

Large language model-based paper classification framework with key-insight extraction and confidence-weighted voting

· 0 citations · 46 references

TL;DR

An LLM-based framework is proposed that leverages full-text key-insight extraction to enhance literature classification and implemented a confidence-weighted voting (CWV) mechanism using multiple LLMs to improve robustness.

View source

Similar papers

A Benchmark Framework for Screening Automation in Systematic Reviews

An evaluation framework that accounts for class imbalance is proposed, i.e., the natural prevalence of excluded articles relative to included articles in SRs, and PromptSR, a tool designed to support prompt experimentation, experiment management, and result analysis for LLM-based screening are introduced.

G.Aravind Kumar, Luciano Marchezan, G. Genois et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

LLM aspect prediction: reviewing academic papers from different aspects with Large Language Model

Peer review is a fundamental process in scholarly publishing, wherein reviewers assess and score various aspects of a manuscript (e.g., novelty, clarity, and significance) based on established evaluation criteria. However, this process demands substantial time and effort, and remains inherently susceptible to human bia...

Zi-Hao Hu, F. Fukumoto, Jian He et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Performance and Consistency of Large Language Models in Key Labor-Intensive Tasks of Systematic Reviews.

A suite of automated tools for automated batch processing that provide decision rationales and evidence enhances transparency and allows for human verification of AI decisions and provides a suite of automated tools for key SR tasks.

Yi-Ran Liu, Xi-Ling Wang, Zi-Xuan Zhou et al. · 0 citations
Conference Aug 2026

Evaluating the Impact of Input Text Properties on LLM-Based Requirements Extraction

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to requirements engineering tasks, yet existing benchmarks measure model performance without accounting for how properties of the input text affect extraction outcomes. Among the broad spectrum of requirements engineering activities, this research focuses on require...

Konstantin Valeev, Fabiano Dalpiaz, F. Aydemir · 0 citations

PRISMA-LLM: An Empirical Reporting Framework for AI-Assisted Systematic Reviews

This work analyzes SciLitBench, a corpus of 888 review-automation papers with 14,726 annotations, to characterize changes in methods, review-stage use, evaluation and reported limitations, and introduces PRISMA-LLM, an empirically grounded framework separating implementation disclosure from consequence-sensitive evalua...

Miguel Zabaleta, Bai-Han Lin · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Operationalising LLM-assisted screening of literature to support systematic reviews

A complete workflow that can be adopted for new, unlabelled reviews, using open-source LLMs small enough to run on a high-end consumer laptop, and provided as an open-source R package is offered.

S. Spillias, Laura Avila-Turriago, C. Brown et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.