Skip to content
Review Open access

A Deep Dive into Fairness, Bias, Threats, and Privacy in Recommender Systems: Insights and Future Research

Jul 2026 · ACM Computing Surveys · Vol 58, pp. 1-39 · 0 citations · 115 references

Abstract

Recommender systems personalize digital experiences across e-commerce, streaming, and social media, yet they face linked challenges in fairness, bias, threats, and privacy. Bias can lead to unequal treatment, so fairness seeks equitable recommendations for all stakeholders. At the same time, adversarial attacks can erode reliability, and extensive use of personal data creates privacy risks that demand robust safeguards. This study surveys these challenges, shows how algorithmic choices can unintentionally reinforce disparities, and reviews strategies for fair recommendation and privacy-preserving learning. We frame these aspects with a unified Privacy–Accuracy–Fairness plus Threat framework that spans data retrieval, ranking and serving, and we advocate standardized evaluation on fixed candidate item pools to isolate tradeoffs between quality and responsibility metrics. By integrating these dimensions, we synthesize current limitations and outline future directions to improve threat resilience, fairness and privacy. We also situate the discussion in ethical and regulatory contexts and translate those principles into practical controls that foster trustworthy systems for diverse populations.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Book Open access Sep 2026

What Price Fairness? Evaluating Energy – Fairness – Accuracy Trade-off in Recommender Systems

The results show that the green cost of fairness is not uniform, post-processing shifts cost to repeated serving, while in-processing and graph-level methods avoid re-ranking overhead but vary substantially across models, datasets, and hardware.

Abhirup Mitra, Oleg Lesota, Antonela Tommasel · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Fair assessment of fair recommender systems: an experimental framework on model and data characteristics

This study proposes an evaluation framework to address fair assessment among recommender systems by analyzing 900 experimental runs across two widely used datasets, three state-of-the-art recommenders, five fairness metrics, and two sensitive attributes.

Yaren Yılmaz, Umutcan Karakas, Yildiz Ulasli et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Long-Term Fairness-Aware Recommendation via Adaptive Fairness Metric Selection

The proposed Long-term Fairness-aware Recommendation via Adaptive Fairness Metric Selection (LFR-via-AFMS) adaptively selects the most appropriate fairness criterion: Equal Opportunity for true causality, and Demographic Parity for spurious correlations, which eliminates unjustified disparities entirely.

Ji-Jun Yu, Minghua Xiong · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Fair on the Surface? Benchmarking Hidden-Output Fairness Gaps in LLM Recommenders

Fairness audits for LLM-based recommenders have largely focused on observable outputs, implicitly assuming that stable recommendations reflect stable internal processing. We challenge this assumption with FairGap, the first benchmark to jointly evaluate recommendation fairness at two levels: observable output shift (OB...

Changyu Lu, Arya Fayyazi, Junhao Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

A Privacy Budgeting Framework for Online Experimentation

This work analytically finds privacy risk budgets that optimally balance exploration and exploitation and applies them to a firm-wide privacy risk budget, and finds that the dynamic strategy is particularly valuable in longer and more complex experiments, and that optimizing the allocation of a firm-wide privacy risk b...

Gilian R. Ponte, Alina Ferecatu · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

iCert-Fair: A Human-Preference-Guided Two-Layer Framework for Multi-Objective Fairness Assessment and Harm Recovery in Credit Scoring

The empirical findings support the use of complementary structural and policy-level interventions and demonstrate the importance of jointly evaluating aggregate disparity, worst-case attribute-level harm, cross-attribute transfer, and predictive utility.

Rashed Bahlool, Nabil Hewahi · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.