DOPS (dynamic operator scheduling), a hardware-aware, closed-loop framework that jointly optimizes operator scheduling and blockwise weight layouts and supports systematic analysis of workload sensitivity and hardware scalability for LLM serving is presented.
Abstract
Prefill-decode disaggregation (PD) and roofline-based operator placement are common strategies for partitioning Large Language Model (LLM) inference across heterogeneous systems, but they are often insufficient in practice. End-to-end latency also depends on workload shape, runtime device contention, and persistent weight layout. We present DOPS (dynamic operator scheduling), a hardware-aware, closed-loop framework that jointly optimizes operator scheduling and blockwise weight layouts. DOPS constructs a stage-aware directed acyclic graph (DAG) and integrates two components: the Bifocal scheduler for dynamic operator-to-device placement and the Weight Layout Arbiter (WLA) for selecting hardware-efficient weight layouts under strict memory constraints. Across representative heterogeneous systems combining neural processing units (NPUs) and processing-in-memory (PIM) devices, Bifocal achieves geometric-mean speedups of 1.20$\times$ to 2.23$\times$ over the PD baseline. WLA provides an additional geometric-mean speedup of 1.28$\times$ to 1.33$\times$ over Bifocal/Linear. DOPS also supports systematic analysis of workload sensitivity and hardware scalability for LLM serving. The source code is available at https://github.com/YIAI-02/TriForm, and the visualization tool is demonstrated at https://youtu.be/Ya_oMCyYno0.
LLM serving systems increasingly disaggregate inference into finer-grained stages, with recent approaches separating attention from FFN or MoE execution during decode. This operator-level disaggregated serving (ODS) can improve hardware matching and enable independent scaling, particularly across heterogeneous devices....
Zi-Kun Li, Yixuan Mei, Shi-Qi Pan et al.· 0 citations
Datacenter GPU power is the binding constraint on LLM serving capacity, and production serving has shifted to prefill/decode (PD) disaggregation. Deploying NVIDIA's Max-Q inference profile on a disaggregated B200 system, we found its realized gain modest (+8.6% tokens/J), model-dependent, and carrying a mean end-to-end...
Jae Gon Kim, Donghoon Yoo, Hanyul Ryu et al.· 0 citations
ExpertPlex is presented, which shares massive MoE experts across phases while disaggregating lightweight attention modules to eliminate over 95% of duplicate model weights and multiplexes dynamically sparse computation, while attention disaggregation reduces attention communication cost.
Large language model (LLM) inference is often constrained by both computation and memory, especially in offloading-based deployments where model weights are transferred across memory hierarchies during autoregressive decoding. In this setting, reducing the number of executed layers can lower per-token latency while als...
Agentic inference now dominates the LLM inference landscape, requiring LLMs to actively engage in multi-turn interactions with tool-calling capabilities. This introduces a more complex workload for the underlying inference system: serving stages such as prefill and decode exhibit substantially different behaviors and d...
Przemyslaw Forys, Haoran Wu, Can Xiao et al.· 0 citations
AFlex is a framework that jointly optimizes resource provisioning and GPU frequency scaling for disaggregated A/F serving and reduces energy per token by up to 49% over state-of-the-art disaggregated serving and 48% over frequency-scaling systems while satisfying TTFT and TPOT SLOs.
Cun-Chen Hu, Liangliang Xu, Tianyu Liu et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.