Skip to content

Beyond Prefill-Decode Disaggregation: Dissecting LLM Inference for Heterogeneous Platforms via Dynamic Operator Scheduling

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.25498 · 0 citations · 83 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

DOPS (dynamic operator scheduling), a hardware-aware, closed-loop framework that jointly optimizes operator scheduling and blockwise weight layouts and supports systematic analysis of workload sensitivity and hardware scalability for LLM serving is presented.

Abstract

Prefill-decode disaggregation (PD) and roofline-based operator placement are common strategies for partitioning Large Language Model (LLM) inference across heterogeneous systems, but they are often insufficient in practice. End-to-end latency also depends on workload shape, runtime device contention, and persistent weight layout. We present DOPS (dynamic operator scheduling), a hardware-aware, closed-loop framework that jointly optimizes operator scheduling and blockwise weight layouts. DOPS constructs a stage-aware directed acyclic graph (DAG) and integrates two components: the Bifocal scheduler for dynamic operator-to-device placement and the Weight Layout Arbiter (WLA) for selecting hardware-efficient weight layouts under strict memory constraints. Across representative heterogeneous systems combining neural processing units (NPUs) and processing-in-memory (PIM) devices, Bifocal achieves geometric-mean speedups of 1.20$\times$ to 2.23$\times$ over the PD baseline. WLA provides an additional geometric-mean speedup of 1.28$\times$ to 1.33$\times$ over Bifocal/Linear. DOPS also supports systematic analysis of workload sensitivity and hardware scalability for LLM serving. The source code is available at https://github.com/YIAI-02/TriForm, and the visualization tool is demonstrated at https://youtu.be/Ya_oMCyYno0.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

OpWeave: Flexible Operator Disaggregation for Heterogeneous LLM Serving

LLM serving systems increasingly disaggregate inference into finer-grained stages, with recent approaches separating attention from FFN or MoE execution during decode. This operator-level disaggregated serving (ODS) can improve hardware matching and enable independent scaling, particularly across heterogeneous devices....

Zi-Kun Li, Yixuan Mei, Shi-Qi Pan et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Phase-Decoupled, Model-Calibrated Power Control for Disaggregated LLM Serving

Datacenter GPU power is the binding constraint on LLM serving capacity, and production serving has shifted to prefill/decode (PD) disaggregation. Deploying NVIDIA's Max-Q inference profile on a disaggregated B200 system, we found its realized gain modest (+8.6% tokens/J), model-dependent, and carrying a mean end-to-end...

Jae Gon Kim, Donghoon Yoo, Hanyul Ryu et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

ExpertPlex: A High-Goodput Disaggregated Serving System for MoE LLMs with Adaptive Persistent Kernels

ExpertPlex is presented, which shares massive MoE experts across phases while disaggregating lightweight attention modules to eliminate over 95% of duplicate model weights and multiplexes dynamically sparse computation, while attention disaggregation reduces attention communication cost.

Bing-Ya Wu, Chao Jin, Zili Zhang et al. · 1 citation
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

FlexEE: Self-Speculative and KV-Compatible Early Exiting for Offloading-Aware LLM Inference

Large language model (LLM) inference is often constrained by both computation and memory, especially in offloading-based deployments where model weights are transferred across memory hierarchies during autoregressive decoding. In this setting, reducing the number of executed layers can lower per-token latency while als...

Qi-Hu Xie, Zi-Wei Li, Yi Kang · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

When Does Disaggregation Pay? Simulating Prefill--Decode--Attention--FFN Specialization for Agentic LLM Inference

Agentic inference now dominates the LLM inference landscape, requiring LLMs to actively engage in multi-turn interactions with tool-calling capabilities. This introduces a more complex workload for the underlying inference system: serving stages such as prefill and decode exhibit substantially different behaviors and d...

Przemyslaw Forys, Haoran Wu, Can Xiao et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Energy-Efficient LLM Serving via Disaggregated Attention--FFN and Flexible Frequency Scaling

AFlex is a framework that jointly optimizes resource provisioning and GPU frequency scaling for disaggregated A/F serving and reduces energy per token by up to 49% over state-of-the-art disaggregated serving and 48% over frequency-scaling systems while satisfying TTFT and TPOT SLOs.

Cun-Chen Hu, Liangliang Xu, Tianyu Liu et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.