SAGE is an evidence-grounded multi-agent framework that reformulates Chinese ancient document understanding as evidence-grounded inference rather than direct answer generation, highlighting the importance of structured, evidence-grounded inference beyond model scaling.
Abstract
Chinese ancient document understanding demands complex visual, linguistic, and historical reasoning. Current Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) typically rely on an opaque, single-pass generation paradigm, often producing overconfident and weakly grounded responses. To address this, we propose SAGE, an evidence-grounded multi-agent framework that reformulates Chinese ancient document understanding as evidence-grounded inference rather than direct answer generation. SAGE coordinates specialized agents for task-aware planning, tool-mediated evidence acquisition, claim-level verification, and bounded replanning under a constrained shared-state runtime. This design supports bounded evidence seeking, answer revision, and abstention when grounding is insufficient. Experiments on the AncientDoc benchmark show that SAGE consistently outperforms matched direct-answering baselines across three LVLM backbones. Remarkably, SAGE with Qwen3.5-9B surpasses much larger monolithic LVLMs on most evaluated metrics, highlighting the importance of structured, evidence-grounded inference beyond model scaling.
Experiments across multiple long-context narrative question answering and claim verification settings show that ClueWeaver substantially improves local end-to-end language models while providing evidence coverage and paragraph-referenced reasoning traces.
Ji-Hao Zhu, Zhi-Wei Yang, Wen-Xiao Zhang et al.· 0 citations
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved strong performance on structured visual understanding tasks such as chart and document question answering. However, existing benchmarks typically evaluate these domains in isolation, leaving underexplored a key capability: whether models can use textual context to determine how chart evidence should be selected, interpreted, and aggregated. We introduce DocHop, a benchmark for integrated chart--context reasoning in document-style images. In DocHop, the document narrative specifies multi-step compositional constraints, while charts provide the corresponding data values. Questions are grounded on a semantic reference label defined in the narrative, requiring models to resolve target entities from context before aggregating evidence across multiple charts. To enable systematic evaluation, we construct DocHop via a stochastic logic-first generation pipeline with controllable reasoning depth and visual density, covering 2,074 examples across six task categories. Experiments on a wide range of proprietary and open-source MLLMs show a substantial gap to human performance: annotators achieve over 90% accuracy, while the best model reaches only 62.83%. Reasoning-enhanced models consistently show improved results, but performance degrades as reasoning complexity increases. Overall, DocHop provides a controlled testbed for challenging multi-hop document reasoning.
Zhuoran Yu, Le Thien Phuc Nguyen, Jaden Park et al.· 1 citation
Metaphor enables the understanding of abstract concepts through cross-domain mappings while conveying affective attitudes. In multimodal scenarios, visual and textual information jointly construct Target--Source mappings, requiring both conceptual understanding and cross-modal reasoning. However, existing benchmarks mainly evaluate metaphor understanding through isolated subtasks and lack evidence-grounded explanations, making it difficult to assess whether models establish mappings grounded in visual and textual cues.To address these limitations, we introduce M$^3$R-Bench, a unified and evidence-grounded benchmark containing 1,000 image--text instances with human-verified annotations. Guided by Conceptual Metaphor Theory and theories of nonliteral language understanding, M$^3$R-Bench provides joint annotations for metaphor occurrence, Target--Source mapping, sentiment, and stage-wise explanations following ``evidence identification--mapping establishment--sentiment inference.''Evaluations on M$^3$R-Bench reveal that existing models often overlook visual evidence, rely on superficial textual cues, and produce inaccurate Target--Source mappings, exposing a cross-modal evidence--mapping mismatch. To address this mismatch, we propose M$^3$R-Reasoner, which combines curriculum-based reasoning supervision with task-aware reinforcement learning to align model reasoning with metaphor interpretation. Experiments show that, with only an 8B-parameter backbone, M$^3$R-Reasoner outperforms larger proprietary MLLMs across four unified-task metrics and improves Visual Evidence and Sentiment Justification scores over GPT-5.5 by 28.45 and 30.11 points, respectively, while surpassing Claude-Sonnet-4.6 by 8.00 points in mean rubric score. The dataset and code are available at https://github.com/hongshi4/M3R-Bench.
Hongye Jiang, Junnan Zhu, Jing-Wang Huang et al.· 0 citations
This paper proposes DocTrace, a hierarchical framework that progressively performs evidence localization, structured document parsing, and evidence graph reasoning to enable explicit evidence provenance, and develops a two-stage training framework.
Lei Xiang, Zhi-Cheng Guan, Hong Chen et al.· 0 citations
EVAR is proposed, an evidence-validated hypothesis admission framework for budget-aware narrative reasoning that improves both task performance and evidence faithfulness while maintaining controllable inference cost.
Pei-Lin Liu, Zhi-Quan Ji, Jing-Long Ping· 0 citations
MPAR-Bench is introduced, a bilingual English-Chinese benchmark that isolates reasoning breadth through multi-point associative reasoning, and case-level analysis shows that extended reasoning can overturn an initially correct hypothesis.
Si'an Xie, Jiaxu Liu, Biao Yang et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
