Jul 2026· Haimaprabha· Vol 25, pp. 86-101· 0 citations
Abstract
This study focuses on a comparative analysis of the phonetic transformations that occurred during the transition from Sanskrit to Prakrit, and the sound changes from Proto-Indo-European to Germanic languages (known as Grimm's Law). Adopting a qualitative approach based on documentary analysis, this study primarily utilizes the comparative method to analyze the data. The main objective of this study is to examine how sounds were distributionally shifted based on their place of articulation during the linguistic transformation from Sanskrit to Prakrit, as well as from Proto-Indo-European to Germanic.
In this study, the grammatical aphorisms (sutras) of Prakrit grammarians such as Vararuchi, Hemachandra, and Chanda are taken as primary evidence, against which the nature of Germanic sound change is compared based on Grimm's Law. The findings reveal that during the phonetic transformation from Sanskrit to Prakrit, almost all sounds underwent a shift or redistribution based on their place of articulation. Along with these positional shifts, changes were also observed in their manner of articulation, voicing (phonation), and aspiration. When these sounds change, they do not disperse to distant places of articulation but rather shift to neighboring positions, or are pronounced from the same position while changing in terms of voicing and aspiration.
In contrast, Grimm's Law reveals a cyclical change in the quality or manner of articulation while the place of articulation remains constant. By comparing these two systems, this paper concludes that sound change from Sanskrit to Prakrit is primarily oriented toward distribution or decentralization, moving toward lenition (weakening/softening of sounds). Conversely, the changes in Grimm's Law do not follow a distributed pattern based on the place of articulation, but are instead centered around fortition (strengthening) and a structural cyclical pattern.
The article is devoted to a comprehensive lexical analysis of M. Simonyan’s English-Armenian dictionary, “Small Dictionary from the English Language, Translated into the Armenian Dialect” (Madras, 1803). Using the example of the first English-Armenian dictionary, the study analyzes the qualitative and structural featur...
Վանուհի Բաղրամյան· Language and Linguistics· 0 citations
The problem of transliteration of foreign proper names is more than painful for Armenians. Unlike ancient times, when Armenian was united, today a foreign word is transliterated into Armenian in three or four ways, due to the lack of canonized laws. The study is the first section of a series of articles examining the p...
Old Tamil literature differs completely from Modern Tamil in both word structure and sentence structure. Tense markers or infixes play a crucial role in denoting the tense of verbs. Although Tolkappiyar defined the tenses as three, he did not analyze and specify the exact tense markers for them. It was Nannular, who ca...
முனைவர் நா. சரண்யா· Tamilmanam International Res...· 0 citations
The semantic aspects of the grammatical category of occurrence and the forms of grammatical expression have often undergone changes during the historical development of the Armenian language. That is why they have often become the subject of examination and discussion in Armenian grammars. The question was addressed mo...
The three words subjected here to etymological analysis, առավոտ, ընթրիք, գոր, have not been analysed by Hrachya Acharian. While the analysis of Gevorg Djahukian is not convincing, the author offers new solutions to the analysis of these three root words.
A detailed analysis of առավոտ concludes that it is much more rea...
Վարդան Պետրոսեան· Haigazian Armenological Revi...· 0 citations