Skip to content
Open access

From Parallel Paths to Crossroads: A Study of DevOps and Low‐Code Development Platforms Through Practitioner Insights

Aug 2026 · Journal of Software: Evolution and Process · 0 citations · 24 references

TL;DR

It is suggested that the crossroads of DevOps and LCDPs serve as an effective channel to operationalize the concept of continuous everything in a more efficient manner.

Abstract

Low‐Code Development Platforms (LCDPs) and DevOps share a common motive to increase agility during the software development process. DevOps focuses on automation, continuous delivery, and rapid response, whereas LCDPs support these practices by simplifying automation through visual programming and rapid prototyping, enabling teams to focus their expertise on decision‐making and other strategic tasks. To investigate how the crossroads of LCDPs and DevOps are valuable in achieving better agility and efficiency, we have conducted interviews with 12 IT project team members who deal with LCDPs and the DevOps environment. The objective of this study is to understand the concept of DevOps with LCDPs and to explore how their integration can contribute to the software development process and organizational agility from practitioners' perspectives. To analyze the interview data, we employed a Grounded Theory (GT) approach to systematically code the data and identify emerging categories and themes. The findings suggested that the crossroads of DevOps and LCDPs serve as an effective channel to operationalize the concept of continuous everything in a more efficient manner. However, to achieve this integration successfully, organizations must consider factors such as bridging gaps between talent needs and the available employment pool, governance, scalability, and a collaborative culture. Finally, we discussed the implications of our findings for practitioners and researchers, as well as opportunities for future research.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Mar 2025

LLMs’ reshaping of people, processes, products, and society in software development: a qualitative exploration with early adopters

Interviews with sixteen early-adopter software professionals who integrated LLM-based tools into their day-to-day work in early to mid-2023 offer actionable implications for developers, organizations, educators, and tool designers seeking to integrate LLMs responsibly into professional software practice.

Benyamin T. Tabarsi, Heidi Reichert, Sam Gilson et al. · 22 citations · ⚡1
Review Open access Aug 2026

Agile Software Development Challenges: Identification, Validation, and Prioritization Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process

This study identifies Inadequate Architecture, Lack of Standardized Framework, Communication and Coordination, Poor Requirement Verification, and Minimum Documentation as the most significant challenges in Agile development.

Kamran Khan Tatari, Shahid Latif, Salim ur Rehman et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

DevSecOps for Secure Software Development: A Systematic Literature Review of Practices, Benefits, and Adoption Barriers

The implementation of DevSecOps has emerged as an essential strategy for incorporating security from the early stages of software development. Its adoption allows for reducing vulnerabilities, streamlining threat detection, and complying with security regulations. Using a Systematic Literature Review, the study retriev...

Patricia Martínez-Moreno, J. A. Vergara-Camacho, Víctor Adrián Lueváno-Mondragon et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Collaboration and Uncertainty Management in Agile Software Development: A Systematic Integrative Review and Literature-Based Positioning of CDM

The synthesis develops a collaborative learning loop linking stakeholder intent, uncertainty, early evidence, consequential decisions, and adaptation, which positions the Collaborative Development Method (CDM) as a literature-grounded configuration of established mechanisms rather than a validated replacement for exist...

Maha Makkass, Youness Laghouaouta, A. Anwar · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

De lo predictivo a lo ágil: hacia un marco híbrido en proyectos de I+D+i

This article provides a conceptual comparison of predictive, agile and hybrid approaches for managing research, development and innovation (R & D & I) projects, with explicit attention to differences between low-TRL research projects and high-TRL innovation and transfer projects. Building on the R&D&I life cycle propos...

Fernando Acebes, Sindy Menéndez, Natalia Martin-Cruz et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.