Skip to content

Precision Software Defect Prediction Using Novel Machine Learning Approaches

Aug 2026 · International Journal of Science, Strategic Management and Technology · 0 citations

TL;DR

This study aims to improve software defect prediction five publicly available NASA datasets by using Random Forest and Classification Network to achieve higher defect prediction accuracy compared to methods without feature selection (WOFS) and to get matrix problem the authors use Classification Network.

Abstract

Abstract - Software defect detection is a crucial area in software engineering focused on identifying issues within software systems. To achieve software success, it is essential to bridge the gap between software engineering and data mining. Various methods, including clustering, statistical techniques, matrix-based neural networks, black box & white box testing, & machine learning, remain employed toward predict software defects. These methods are applied to enhance accuracy in defect prediction through machine learning. Objective of this study is toward improving software defect prediction five publicly available NASA datasets: CM1, JM1, KC2, KC1, and PC1. Feature assortment performances are cohesive through ML methods, such as Random Forest to achieve higher defect prediction accuracy compared to methods without feature selection (WOFS) and to get matrix problem we use Classification Network. A defect is defined as an imperfection caused by an error, fault, or failure in the software development process. In this context, an "error" refers to human actions leading to undesirable outcomes, while a "defect" denotes a decision resulting in incorrect outcomes when attempting to resolve a problem. Software defect prediction has gained prominence in recent years due to its direct impact on software quality. Defective software modules can affect product quality, leading to cost overruns, delays in project timelines, and increased maintenance expenses. Key Words:  software defect prediction five publicly available NASA datasets: CM1, JM1, KC2, KC1, and PC1.

View source

Similar papers

Conference Open access 2026

Cross Project Software Defect Prediction Using Machine Learning with Optimized Feature Selection

In smart city software systems, where interconnected services demand high reliability, Software Defect Prediction (SDP) plays a vital role and reducing maintenance costs by identifying defect-prone modules early in the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). Cross-Project Defect Prediction (CPDP) enables defect data fr...

Emediong Bassey Obot, Victor Anaga, Sadiq Thomas et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access 2026

Software Failure Prediction and Efficiency Optimization Using AI/ML Techniques

The analysis indicates that no single model is universally optimal; robust software failure prediction requires dataset-aware preprocessing, leakage-safe validation, imbalance-aware evaluation, and an explicit trade-off among predictive performance, computational efficiency, and interpretability.

Prasad Mathapati, S. G. Gollagi, Zebashireen Fahim Shaikh · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Comparative Analysis of Ensemble Learning Methods for Software Reliability Prediction

The results demonstrate that ensemble methods provide superior performance in identifying reliability levels, and which classification method is most suitable for predicting software reliability based on code metrics such as Cyclomatic Complexity and Halstead Volume.

Nadir Subaşı, Ö. Özer · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Research on Software Defect Prediction Based on Static and Dynamic Feature Fusion and Machine Learning

Aiming at the problems that the static-dynamic feature fusion mechanism lacks systematic multi-scenario verification, the feature-model adaptation law is unclear, and the engineering practicability of existing research conclusions is insufficient, this paper proposes a static-dynamic feature fusion defect prediction me...

Tian-Yu Yin · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Automated software debugging and bug prediction through the use of machine learning and deep learning

The results indicate that traditional ML models, especially random forest and extra trees, are still very effective for metric-based defect prediction, while DL and multi-modal approaches need to be fed with richer software artifacts to reach their full potential.

Amro Mohammad Abed Alfattah Abdin, Mohanad Alayedi, Ahmad M. Jaradat · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.