2026· Bulletin of the Saint Petersburg State Institute of Technology (Technical University)· Vol 77, pp. 70-73· 0 citations
TL;DR
The aim of the work is to create a lightweight desktop application for local analysis and visualization of intermolecular interactions in protein-ligand complexes using the DockAnalyzer graphical interface and the modular architecture makes expanded functionality possible.
Abstract
A program with the DockAnalyzer graphical interface has been developed to automate the analysis of molecular docking results in CIF format. The need for such a tool is caused by the exponential growth of data during virtual screening, when manual processing of a large number of files becomes impossible, and existing solutions require complex configuration or transfer of confidential structures to external servers. The aim of the work is to create a lightweight desktop application for local analysis and visualization of intermolecular interactions in protein-ligand complexes.
The program is implemented in Python using the GEMMI, NumPy, and Tkinter libraries. The architecture includes modules for parsing CIF files, geometric classification of contacts (hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic interactions, flares) and an interactive table with color coding of bond types. Additionally, integration with the P2Rank tool for predicting ligand-binding pockets is implemented, which allows comparing calculated contacts with predicted binding regions.
Testing on the reference complex of HIV-1 protease with an inhibitor confirmed the correctness of the operation: 470 contacts were automatically identified, the distribution by type of interactions and the remnants of the binding site coincided with those annotated in the PDB. A comparative analysis with analogues (PLIP, Arpeggio, BINANA 2) showed that the advantages of DockAnalyzer are visual visualization of data directly in the contact table, the absence of dependencies on external servers, and confidentiality of processing due to local startup. The program exports the results to TXT and CSV formats for further statistical processing. The modular architecture makes expanded functionality possible, including support for new file formats and machine learning methods for predicting binding pockets.
Protein–ligand interaction diagrams are a routine part of structural and medicinal chemistry, but the tools that produce them tend to force a choice: comprehensive detection with tabular output, publication-quality figures behind a licence, or a scripting environment that assumes expertise. PandaMap (Protein AND ligAnd...
The interface prediction program WHISCY is presented, which combines surface conservation and structural information to predict protein–protein interfaces and demonstrates the potential of using interface predictions to drive protein–protein docking.
S. D. de Vries, A. V. van Dijk, A. M. J. J. Bonvin· 0 citations
Siteomix is an integrated plugin for the PyMOL molecular graphics system that automates the detection of binding pockets via the LIGSITE algorithm, visualizes them as discrete point clouds colored by cavity depth, and performs a two-step alignment combining the rigid iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm with differe...
Kira M. Velieva, E. Skorb, S. Shityakov· Journal of Computer-Aided Mo...· 0 citations
COACH-D 2.0 is introduced, a substantially enhanced template-based method for predicting protein-ligand binding sites and features three key advances: integration of multimeric templates from Q-BioLiP into the authors' in-house library, a new multimeric structure processing module enabling binding site prediction for p...
Xiao-Yu An, Hong Wei, Wenkai Wang et al.· Genomics, Proteomics & Bioin...· 0 citations
Semdock is presented, an extension of the original workflow that enables the preparation of docking-ready ligands from raw SDF, SMILES, and CSV datasets through an automated ligand preparation procedure and implements ligand-wise CPU-parallel docking.
Shahariar Emon, M. Haque, Iftekhar Alam et al.· STAR Protocols· 0 citations
Docking should be considered as an important and computationally inexpensive reference baseline for binding affinity prediction, and the scoring function and the protein structure are the most important factors for binding affinity accuracy in rigid docking with the MOE software.
Konstantinos Tornesakis, J. Essex, Paul A. Cox et al.· Journal of Computer-Aided Mo...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.