SKILL-KD is proposed, a contrastive skill distillation framework that treats skills as an explicit distillation medium between agents of different capabilities and consistently improves frozen student agents over fixed-model adaptation baselines.
Abstract
Skill-based prompting has become a practical mechanism for improving large language model (LLM) agents, yet existing skill acquisition methods often treat skills as experience summaries, memory entries, or direct summaries of successful demonstrations. This creates a mismatch for weaker student agents: when a student fails because it lacks task knowledge or operational strategy, its failed trajectory may not contain enough evidence to infer the missing behavior, while the teacher trajectory may be too implicit to be internalized as reusable guidance. We propose SKILL-KD, a contrastive skill distillation framework that treats skills as an explicit distillation medium between agents of different capabilities. Given a student failure and the teacher trajectory on the same task, SKILL-KD distills their actionable discrepancy into a textual skill patch, evaluates the patch by re-running the student, and iteratively refines the patch when the student still fails. To prevent repeated local updates from causing skill drift, SKILL-KD further maintains trace-linked edit histories and performs Drift-Aware Skill Consolidation, deciding whether each patch should add a new rule, delete or modify an existing rule, or be skipped. Across five agent benchmarks and two student settings, SKILL-KD consistently improves frozen student agents over fixed-model adaptation baselines.
Language-model agents increasingly rely on skills: reusable procedural knowledge for reasoning, tool use, and interaction. Existing work studies how skills are acquired, retrieved, compressed, or composed, but often assumes that once a skill is selected, its interface to the agent is fixed. We argue that this overlooks a key source of skill utility: the same skill can help, distract, or mislead depending on how it is exposed. We propose SkillAlign, a provider-agnostic framework that represents candidate skills as multi-view procedural cards and renders them through alternative exposure interfaces, including full instructions, hints, compressed summaries, workflows, or no exposure. This enables counterfactual evaluation where the task, agent, and candidate skills are fixed while only the exposure interface varies. Across ALFWorld and SkillsBench, we show that exposure form substantially affects task success and rendered context cost, and that compact top-k exposure can outperform full-library injection. We further conduct a replay-based policy-learning analysis on ALFWorld, showing that adaptive exposure contains learnable signal but remains far from oracle selection. Our results suggest that skill-augmented agents should optimize not only which skills to use, but also how those skills are presented.
Agent skills provide frozen large language model (LLM) agents with reusable procedural guidance, and recent work shows that such skills can be optimized with ground-truth (GT) feedback. Many applications, however, lack GT labels, task scores, rewards, or reliable task-specific evaluators. We therefore introduce Self-Supervised Skill Optimization (SSO), a comparative framework that learns a reusable skill from unlabeled task instances alone. At each step, SSO runs the current skill on an unlabeled batch, uses a subset of the resulting executions to generate complete skill probes, and runs the probes on the same batch. An LLM judge compares the resulting answers, trajectories, artifacts, or terminal states. A separate behavior extractor identifies behavioral differences without seeing the judge's decisions. SSO uses these decisions to aggregate evidence for and against the observed behaviors across instances. It then ranks the behaviors by the resulting evidence and renders a new complete skill from the highest-ranked behaviors. The update is accepted only if the new skill outperforms the current one on an unlabeled validation set. SSO outperforms existing GT-free prompt optimizers on both closed-ended and open-ended tasks. On closed-ended benchmarks, it approaches and sometimes exceeds the strongest GT-based skill optimizer without using any GT feedback.
Siran Peng, Cui-Yu Yang, Tianyu Fu et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
SkillProx is introduced, a proximal-gradient-inspired forward--backward framework that couples closed-loop diagnostic evolution with utility-aware proximal refinement and demonstrates the complementary effects of closed-loop diagnosis and proximal refinement.
Mingxuan Zheng, Yu-Jin Zhou, Chuxue Cao et al.· 2 citations
SkillCommit is an online skill evolution framework that continuously transforms experience into a hierarchical library of reusable skills, enabling cross-model experience transfer and consistently improves agent performance across diverse domains.
This work proposes BCSD (Bidirectional Context Self-Distillation), a framework that combines self-distillation with reinforcement learning to train LLM agents to use external skills more effectively, enabling agents to utilize external skills more effectively.
Tian Pan, Yuan Li, Hong-Da Wang et al.· 0 citations
Results show that TRACE converts high model potential into stable, consistent performance gain, and bridge the gap between potential and reliable performance to just 4.0 points.
Wenhao Wu, Menghao Zhang, X. Wang et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
