Nov 2026· Expert Review of Medical Devices· 0 citations· 16 references
Medicine
TL;DR
The US framework provides more structured and centralised specialised pathways with extensive regulator-developer engagement, whereas the EU system remains decentralised and less harmonised.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
The number of medical devices entering global markets continues to grow, creating challenges for regulators seeking to balance patient access and protection of public health. The United States (US) and the European Union (EU) represent the two predominant regulatory systems for medical devices, yet they differ significantly in pathways to first clinical use and early patient access structure and implementation.
AREAS COVERED
This narrative review examines specialised regulatory pathways that enable or accelerate first clinical use of medical devices outside standard market approval processes in the US and EU. Regulatory legislation, guidance documents, and policy materials from the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Commission were analysed. Pathways reviewed include compassionate use and expanded access mechanisms, expedited programmes such as the Breakthrough Device Program, humanitarian and orphan device pathways, and exemptions for custom-made or in-house manufactured devices. Key characteristics, including eligibility criteria, clinical evidence requirements, and regulatory oversight are compared across jurisdictions.
EXPERT OPINION
The US framework provides more structured and centralised specialised pathways with extensive regulator-developer engagement, whereas the EU system remains decentralised and less harmonised. Greater clarity in clinical evidence requirements, improved harmonisation, and earlier regulatory engagement could strengthen EU pathways while maintaining patient safety.
A comparative review of orphan drug policies and designation criteria implemented by the US Food and Drug Administration, the European Medicines Agency, and Japan's Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency is performed, assessing their influence on development, approval, and access.
R. Elango, Russell Martin, S. Mutta· Farmacia Hospitalaria· 0 citations
OBJECTIVES
Regulatory frameworks for medical devices are continually evolving to keep pace with technological innovation, aiming to ensure safety and efficacy. However, regulatory requirements differ substantially across countries, creating challenges for manufacturers, regulators, and timely patient access to medical...
Bunchai Chongmelaxme, Nargis Saharan, Kok Pim Kua· Value in Health Regional Iss...· 0 citations
Summary Innovation in medical technologies, especially AI-enabled tools, is exposing the limits of Europe’s current medical device regulatory dogma. Existing rules treat devices as isolated products rather than integrated systems shaping care. Any region that wants to be home to the most innovative businesses and techn...
Anett Schönfelder, Tom Melvin, Timo Minssen et al.· The Lancet Regional Health -...· 0 citations
Medical devices encompass a wide range, from simple instruments to complex implants and software, and recent technological advancements have significantly increased both their number and clinical significance. Bringing a medical device from concept to clinical use requires an integrated pathway combining structured res...
Umut Doğu Seçkin, Aylin Buhur, Y. Uyanıkgil· Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakü...· 0 citations
This review conducts a comparative analysis of drug approval for new and generic medicines across three jurisdictions: United States (US FDA), India (CDSCO), and the European Union (EMA) framed as a three-stage process (application, review, approval) and focusing on regulatory pathways, statutory timelines, documentati...
Suchita Anand Shirole, Syed Shoaib Ali· International Journal of Dru...· 0 citations
The current study will offer an extensive comparison of drug marketing authorization systems within the European Union (EU) and Canada. It examines and compares the regulations, submission procedures, the availability of scientific advice, the type of review, the approving authorities, and the post-review requirements...
Vinuthna Rallapalli, Sundar Sankaralingam, Vengalasetti Nikita Devi· International Journal of Dru...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.