Skip to content
Preprint

Auto-Fill: Learning to Predict Missing Values Accurately with Specialist Language Models

Jul 2026 · 0 citations · 75 references
Computer Science

Abstract

Predicting missing cell values in tabular data is a fundamental problem in data cleaning. While state-of-the-art reasoning models show great promise in predicting missing values in tables, by reasoning holistically across rows and columns, they are costly to deploy at scale and tend to be overconfident, often generating hallucinated or false-positive predictions. In this paper, we observe that achieving high-precision missing-value prediction in tables requires a distinct combination of three capabilities: (1) world knowledge, (2) text-based reasoning, and (3) code-based reasoning. We systematically explore design choices for combining these capabilities, and propose an Auto-Fill approach that post-trains three specialist small language models (SLMs), each optimized for one capability. We develop a calibrated ensemble mechanism that either dynamically selects the most confident specialist or abstains, ensuring high accuracy. Extensive experiments on 11 benchmarks with 2200 real tables drawn from diverse domains show that Auto-Fill achieves superior accuracy compared to state-of-the-art reasoning models (e.g., o3-pro, Gemini 3 Pro, and DeepSeek R1), while operating at a fraction (less than 1%) of the cost of these frontier models. Our results highlight the effectiveness of specialization and calibrated abstention in the important domain of tabular data. Auto-Fill is publicly available at https://github.com/lyrain2001/auto-fill.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Why Large Language Models Fail at Tabular Prediction

The results show that the LLM's capability dissolves with dimension in a way no noise-corrupted classical learner mimics - which explains why LLMs, so capable elsewhere, keep losing to fifty-year-old baselines on tables, while leaving the mechanism of the prediction as an open question.

M. Garnelo, Wojciech M. Czarnecki · 0 citations
Review Jul 2026

ConfidenceBench: Evaluating Confidence Calibration in Large Language Models

ConfidenceBench, a calibration benchmark that evaluates verbalized confidence estimates in 15 frontier LLMs using the Brier score, a proper scoring rule that incentivises truthful probability reporting shows that verbalized confidence calibration is a distinct and practically important axis of LLM reliability, complementary to standard accuracy-based evaluation.

M. ffrench-Constant, Daniel Yang, Xinmeng Huang et al. · 1 citation · ⚡1
Preprint Jul 2026

Future Confidence Distillation in Large Language Models

It is demonstrated that confidence-related information evolves throughout the answering process and can be anticipated before answer generation is complete, enabling significantly more reliable yet low-cost confidence estimation.

Sahil Kale · 0 citations
Conference Open access 2026

When Models Hesitate: Answer Instability as a Label-Free Uncertainty Signal for LLMs

This work proposes answer instability, defined as the variability of a model’s final answer across repeated stochastic generations of the same prompt, as a simple, label-free, and black-box uncertainty signal, and demonstrates its utility for selective prediction and targeted repair, improving reliability without access to internal probabilities or additional training.

J. M. Araña, Kristine Ann M. Carandang, Ethan Robert A. Casin et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Aug 2026

Understanding the Surprising Generalization Properties of Tabular Foundation Models

A task-centric, retrieval-based perspective is offered for how TFMs generalize: it is believed that tabular in-context generalization is largely retrieval-based, and good models are those that learn to identify relevant examples in the provided context and aggregate them well.

Nour Shaheen, Junwei Ma, Alex Labach et al. · 1 citation