Skip to content

MIRA-Math: A Benchmark for Minimal Information Requesting and Mathematical Reasoning

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.07391 · 0 citations
Computer Science

TL;DR

Experiments across frontier and small models show that request success and final-answer accuracy are separable: models may ask for the right fact yet fail the downstream computation, or fail before obtaining the canonical hint.

Abstract

Mathematical reasoning benchmarks typically provide all facts needed to solve each problem, while interactive benchmarks often mix reasoning with tools, retrieval, and long-horizon dialogue. We introduce MIRA-Math, a benchmark for a narrower diagnostic capability: solving mathematical problems whose full latent state has a unique answer, but whose solver-facing view is missing exactly one necessary atomic fact. The solver must request the missing information in natural language under a strict budget and then integrate the returned fact into an exact final answer. A fixed constrained LLM responder sees only the dataset-provided atomic fact and must either offer the quoted fact when the request matches it, or decline otherwise. Thus, instance generation, typed hint specifications, validation, and final-answer verification are deterministic, while request metrics are measured under a fixed LLM-mediated responder channel. MIRA-Math contains 2{,}310 generated instances from 22 typed mathematical families spanning algebra, probability, linear systems, discrete structures, signal processing, Markov chains, circuits, interpolation, and numerical boundary-value problems. Experiments across frontier and small models show that request success and final-answer accuracy are separable: models may ask for the right fact yet fail the downstream computation, or fail before obtaining the canonical hint. We release generators, verifiers, prompts, run metadata, and dataset documentation to support reproducible evaluation of minimal information requesting in mathematical reasoning.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Magenta: Closing the Loop Between Mathematical Reasoning and Lean Verification

This paper introduces Magenta, a training-free agentic pipeline that, given only a natural-language problem, produces an answer, expresses it as a Lean 4 statement, and constructs a machine-checked proof, which achieves 100% accuracy across all evaluated olympiad benchmarks.

Joshua Ong Jun Leang, Hao-Nan Li, Zheng-Yang Zhao et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Ask, Condition or Abstain: Reinforcement Learning for Missing-Premise Reasoning

ACA-RL supports a new mission for NLP evaluation: measuring whether models can recognize when a task is underdetermined and handle uncertainty, not only whether they can answer fully specified questions.

Yong-Qi Tong, Zhenyu Zhang, Zimou Liu et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

Constraint-First Reasoning: A Training-Free Protocol for Exploiting Answer-Space Constraints in Mathematical Problem Solving

This work introduces Constraint-First Reasoning (CFR), a training-free two-stage prompting protocol that improves direct CoT on multiple backbones and positions CFR as a targeted test-time intervention whose benefit depends on recoverable constraints and reliable Stage 1 extraction.

Hongbo Ma, Bang Yang, Y. Cheng et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Clueing up LLMs with Tool-Augmented Deductive Reasoning

This paper implements a text-based, multi-agent version of the classic board game Clue as an environment to evaluate multi-step, agentic deductive reasoning, and introduces a tool-augmented approach in which a structured possibility matrix converts implicit game state from generated reasoning logs into an explicit repr...

Rebecca Ansell, Autumn Toney-Wails · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Ask Before You Optimize: Dynamic Pre-Formulation Clarification for Interactive Optimization

This work introduces OR-Clarify, a benchmark for pre-formulation clarification and proposes Interactive Optimization (InterOPT), a two-stage framework that identifies unresolved formulation-critical gaps and uses them to guide whether to ask the next question or to stop.

Si-Han Ge, Yi-Chen Lin, Chen-Yu Zhou et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.