Four convergent, non-traditional pillars emerged — programmable CRISPR-Cas and CRISPRi genomic tools, monoclonal antibodies and bioconjugates, antimicrobial and anticancer peptides, and stimuli-responsive nanozymes and exosomal carriers — each capable of bypassing classical resistance mechanisms while, at least in preclinical models, sparing commensal microbiota.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become one of the defining threats to survival in intensive and neonatal intensive care units, where vulnerable hosts, invasive devices, and heavy empirical antibiotic exposure converge to select for multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant ESKAPE and non-aeruginosa Pseudomonas pathogens. We conducted a narrative-scoping synthesis of the peer-reviewed literature identified through targeted searches and, restricted to English-language articles addressing AMR mechanisms and next-generation, non-traditional therapeutics in critical care; reference lists were hand-searched, and findings were organized thematically rather than statistically pooled. Four convergent, non-traditional pillars emerged — programmable CRISPR-Cas and CRISPRi genomic tools, monoclonal antibodies and bioconjugates, antimicrobial and anticancer peptides (notably proline-rich peptides), and stimuli-responsive nanozymes and exosomal carriers — each capable of bypassing classical resistance mechanisms while, at least in preclinical models, sparing commensal microbiota. Persistent translational barriers include bedside diagnostic blindness to biofilm-embedded organisms, an unresolved neonatal and pediatric pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic void, and stewardship frameworks that still largely ignore the human resistome. Bridging bench-to-bedside gaps will require standardized biofilm models, dedicated pediatric PK/PD trials, artificial-intelligence-assisted therapeutic design, and microbiome-conscious stewardship, particularly given resource disparities across low- and middle-income settings.
This study investigates the CRISPR-Cas framework’s potential as a cutting-edge tactic to fight antimicrobial resistance, and finds that the efficiency of CRISPR-Cas is diminished in some bacterial strains due to variations in their CRISPR loci.
Akmal Zubair, M. Hemal, Alaeldeen Ahmed et al.· Archives of Microbiology· 0 citations
Bacteriophage therapy demonstrated the greatest translational maturity, followed by AMPs with limited early clinical progression, followed by CRISPR-Cas-based antimicrobials with limited early clinical progression.
Z. Kimera, E. Mbugi, M. I. Matee· Discover Public Health· 0 citations
Current preclinical evidence suggests that miRNAs hold promise as early-stage candidate antibacterial agents through immunomodulation, host pathway regulation, and direct bacterial gene silencing with biofilm disruption.
Recent advances in antimicrobial nanomaterials, nanodrug delivery systems, antibiofilm strategies, and nanodiagnostics are summarized and the potential of nanotechnology to support sustainable AMR management across interconnected human, animal, and environmental sectors is emphasized.
This review provides an integrated overview of emerging AV approaches targeting quorum sensing, type III secretion systems, biofilm development, adhesion, toxin activity, iron acquisition, and host-pathogen interactions and suggests that AV therapy is best positioned as a precision anti-infective strategy.
Ruchita Bhomia, S. Chatterjee· Infection· 0 citations
The convergence of novel antibiotic agents and non-traditional antimicrobial strategies reviewed herein provides the foundation for a new paradigm in the management of drug-resistant IAIs, as well as alternatives to classic therapies for IAIs.
E. Toma, Octavian Enciu, Irina-Mihaela Matache et al.· Antibiotics· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.