Skip to content
Review Open access

Evaluating Summaries of Social Media Posts: Balancing Fairness for Readers and Authors

Jul 2026 · ACM Transactions on the Web · 0 citations · 29 references

TL;DR

This work represents the first attempt to develop a fair summary evaluation framework for social media posts and is likely to spark future research in this domain.

Abstract

Text summarization has a wide range of applications, from condensing lengthy documents to summarizing user-generated content (such as tweets, Facebook posts, and Reddit discussions) that reflect diverse viewpoints on socially significant topics. Traditionally, summarization has been considered a reader-centric task, and algorithms are evaluated against human-written reference summaries using metrics such as the ROUGE score. However, this approach has two primary limitations when applied to user-generated content, especially written on sensitive issues. First, through surveys with participants from various countries, we demonstrate that human-written reference summaries can contain implicit biases. These biases introduce significant variations in the evaluation of summarization algorithms, raising concerns about their reliability in identifying summaries that effectively meet reader expectations. Second, we show that algorithmically generated summaries, as ranked by traditional evaluation methods, often fail to align with authors’ preferences. These issues render the existing summary evaluation framework suboptimal for both readers and the authors of the content being summarized. In this work, by reimagining summarization of user-generated content as a two-sided problem, we emphasize the importance of satisfying both readers and authors. Specifically, we take a two-pronged approach to tackle the issues with existing evaluation setup: (i) we introduce the concept of inequality in reader satisfaction to tackle the implicit biases in reference summaries; and (ii) we propose a novel evaluation framework based on satisfying the authors of the content. More specifically, we present an author satisfaction-based evaluation metric CROSSEM which, we show empirically, can complement the current summary evaluation paradigm. This work represents the first attempt to develop a fair summary evaluation framework for social media posts and is likely to spark future research in this domain.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

The Media Bias Detector: A framework for annotating and analyzing the news

News organizations introduce bias into their coverage via the choices they make about which topics to cover (or ignore) and how to frame the issues they do decide to cover. Here, we introduce the Media Bias Detector, a scalable computational framework that integrates large language models (LLMs) with near-real-time new...

Samar Haider, Amir Tohidi, Jenny S. Wang et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Automatic Generation of Summaries From Informal Social Media Text Using Transformers

A novel abstractive summarisation framework designed to distill coherent and semantically rich summaries from social media discussions that consistently outperforms mainstream summarisation methods, including advanced systems like ChatGPT, particularly in preserving semantic alignment and improving readability under no...

A. Papagiannopoulou, C. Angeli · 0 citations
Book Open access Aug 2026

Information Satisfaction: A Reader-Centered Axis for Summarization Evaluation

An expert human evaluation is conducted, measuring summary preferences based on information satisfaction given a specific person’s background and use case, and finds that both traditional and LLM-based metrics are insufficient measures of information satisfaction and agree poorly with human judgment.

Isabel Cachola, W. Walden, Reno Kriz et al. · 0 citations
Open access 2026

Learning through News: Bridging the Gap between Algorithmic Recommendation and Human Curation

The results demonstrate that human-curated content-based recommendation can positively and significantly impact readers’ knowledge retention and show that a fine-grained coreference system can approach said level of human curation better than state-of-the-art document retrieval methods.

Florian Debaene, Loic De Langhe, Orphée De Clercq et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Who Speaks Matters: Authority-Aware Multi-View RAG over Italian Parliamentary Proceedings

ParliamentRAG is a topic-dependent authority model that estimates each speaker's authority as a function of the current query, combining interpretable components such as profession, education, and previous interventions that addresses risks of dominance of the most frequent speakers, inability to weight speakers accord...

Mirko Tritella, Riccardo Pozzi, Matteo Palmonari · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.