The OmniEdit-Bench provides a comprehensive and reliable testbed for evaluating instruction-based video editing and offers insights into future research directions, including an accuracy-aware penalty mechanism that conditions other scores on accuracy, preventing visually plausible but incorrect edits from receiving inflated evaluations.
Abstract
Instruction-based video editing (IVE) is an emerging field with broad applications, yet evaluating editing models remains challenging. Existing benchmarks suffer from two major limitations: limited task coverage inherited from image editing, which overlooks video-specific dimensions, and inadequate metrics that fail to measure instruction fidelity, allowing incorrect edits to receive high scores due to strong visual priors from the original video. To address these issues, we introduce a comprehensive and structured benchmark for IVE. Our benchmark decomposes editing tasks into multiple video-specific dimensions, including spatial, temporal, audio, and reference-based editing, extending beyond conventional frame-level evaluation. It also distinguishes explicit and implicit instructions and incorporates reasoning-based scenarios to better reflect real-world requirements. Furthermore, we propose an evaluation framework that assesses editing quality from four complementary dimensions: accuracy, preservation, realism, and consistency, using both human judgments and state-of-the-art vision-language models. To emphasize instruction fidelity, we introduce an accuracy-aware penalty mechanism that conditions other scores on accuracy, preventing visually plausible but incorrect edits from receiving inflated evaluations. Extensive experiments on representative open-source and commercial models show that current IVE models remain far from satisfactory. OmniEdit-Bench provides a comprehensive and reliable testbed for evaluating instruction-based video editing and offers insights into future research directions. The project page is https://omniedit-bench.github.io/.
RefVideo-6M, a large-scale reference-guided editing dataset containing 5 million video editing samples and 1 million image editing samples, is introduced and enables the training of powerful editing models with improved visual quality, controllability, and reference consistency.
Bojia Zi, Xiaoyan Yang, Yu Zhou et al.· 0 citations
The quality and diversity of instruction-based video editing datasets are steadily improving, yet existing datasets mainly focus on single editing operations and fall short in supporting compositional instruction-guided video editing. In particular, multiple editing intents must be jointly understood and faithfully executed within the same video. To address this issue, we introduce CoinVE-200K, a large-scale, high-quality dataset for Compositional Instruction-Guided Video Editing. CoinVE-200K contains 1080p video-editing pairs of up to 201 frames, covering diverse compositional scenarios where each sample involves 2 to 5 atomic editing operations. The instructions target humans, objects, and backgrounds, and cover edit types such as addition, removal, modification, and stylization. All samples are built through a carefully designed generation and filtering pipeline to ensure instruction faithfulness, visual quality, temporal consistency, and compositional diversity. We also introduce CoinVE-Bench, a benchmark for compositional-instruction video editing across diverse subjects, operation types, and instruction complexities. Furthermore, we present CoinVE-Edit, a 22B compositional video editing model built upon Wan2.1-T2V-14B and Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct. CoinVE-Edit disentangles region-aware attention for different editing instructions, enabling precise multi-region editing while preserving irrelevant content and temporal coherence. Experiments on CoinVE-Bench show that CoinVE-Edit achieves strong performance in instruction following, compositional editing accuracy, visual quality, and temporal consistency.
Fuchen Long, Cong Wang, Zitao Gao et al.· 1 citation
Audio-video (AV) editing aims to modify audio and video content according to a target prompt. Unlike single-modality editing, AV editing requires models to infer a modality-selective edit scope from the prompt alone: determining not only what should change, but also which modality should be preserved. Faithfully evaluating such models therefore requires both (i) benchmarks that span diverse edit types and modality categories, and (ii) evaluation that is itself modality-aware and sample-specific. However, existing AV editing benchmarks provide limited coverage of edit types and modality combinations, while current evaluation systems are often modality-blind and sample-agnostic, making it difficult to assess whether models faithfully preserve the unintended modality. To address these gaps, we introduce AVENUE, Audio-Video EditiNg Understanding and Evaluation, comprising two contributions: (1) a benchmark of 1,291 source clips and 7,957 editing instructions across audio-targeted, video-targeted, and AV-coupled edit types, curated and human-verified from VGGSound; and (2) a sample-specific, modality-aware evaluation framework that specifies, for each sample, both the intended change and the content that must remain intact. We evaluate representative AV editing models spanning three editing paradigms : joint, sequential, and separate, providing the first systematic analysis of modality-selectivity across paradigms. Our findings reveal a fundamental open challenge: when editing one modality, existing models frequently induce unintended changes in the other, regardless of paradigm. AVENUE provides a benchmark and modality-aware evaluation framework to drive progress toward more controllable AV editing models. Our dataset is publicly available on Hugging Face: https://huggingface.co/datasets/AVENUE-dataset/AVENUE.
Video editing is fundamentally message-driven: even from the same source footage, the selected shots change depending on the narrative the editor wishes to convey. Benchmarks for a closely related task, video summarization, reduce editorial intent to a single, message-agnostic notion of saliency and thus do not account for this diversity. For evaluating message-driven video editing, we present \textbf{MEDit-Bench}, a dataset and benchmark, which pairs long-form videos with multiple editing messages and multiple professionally produced edits per message, demonstrating that different messages yield substantially different edits from the same source. We define an automatic evaluation protocol based on temporal alignment metrics, and find that an LLM-as-a-judge preference, a natural proxy for narrative quality, is unreliable for this task due to severe position bias. We additionally annotate each message with ambiguity and contextfulness scores, and show that both dimensions negatively correlate with model performance, establishing message difficulty as a meaningful stratification factor. Experiments with state-of-the-art MLLMs and reinforcement fine-tuned baselines show that while strong models approach human temporal alignment at lenient thresholds, all models fall behind humans at stricter criteria. A human perceptual study further confirms a large quality gap, with professional human edits remaining consistently preferred over model outputs.
Katsuya Ogata, Zongshang Pang, Mayu Otani et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
With the rapid advancement of image editing models and their widespread application across various domains, there is an increasingly urgent need to deploy these model capabilities directly into real-world scenarios. However, existing benchmarks remain confined to simple single-image tasks, suffering from limited coverage dimensions and an inability to effectively differentiate performance among diverse models. Consequently, they fail to reliably evaluate model performance in complex multi-image editing, highly demanding reasoning instructions, and practical deployment settings. To address these limitations, we propose CPI-Bench, a Comprehensive, Practical and Intelligent benchmark for real-world image editing. CPI-Bench comprises three core subsets: CPI-General-Bench, which comprehensively covers diverse editing tasks and introduces multi-image editing evaluation; CPI-Practical-Bench, which focuses on high-frequency real-user application scenarios; and CPI-Intelligent-Bench, which is dedicated to evaluating capabilities in highly demanding reasoning-based editing. Evaluation results of mainstream image editing models based on CPI-Bench demonstrate that CPI-Bench enhances performance differentiation among models. It provides a comprehensive and reliable quantification of gaps in general editing capabilities, practical deployment efficacy, and advanced reasoning-based editing, offering invaluable guidance for the future optimization of image editing models. Crucially, our ranking analysis reveals that CPI-Bench achieves the highest alignment with the Arena Image Edit Leaderboard, indicating stronger consistency with public human preference rankings, serving as an effective proxy for public human evaluations.
Qinye Zhou, Jun Zheng, Yongchao Du et al.· 2 citations
This work conducts a large-scale evaluation of more than 20 recent MLLMs and shows that video instruction following remains challenging for current models, especially for instructions with many constraints, semantic constraints, or complex conditional structures that require selecting the correct branch or path based on video content.
Hongbo Liu, Peixian Chen, Siyuan Liu et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
