Skip to content
#computer vision Preprint

Unsupervised Anomaly Detection for Image Dataset Quality Assurance in Multi-Center Breast MRI

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 38 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work builds a controlled AD benchmark of 17 realistic QA-relevant anomaly types from six public datasets and proposes a taxonomy of radiological image anomalies based on human visual perception, enabling fine-grained analysis of AD failure modes, establishing a foundation and practical guidance on scalable unsupervised QA in medical AI pipelines.

Abstract

Corrupted, inconsistent, or anomalous data silently threatens the safety and reliability of medical AI. Despite growing regulatory recognition of dataset quality assurance (QA) for high-risk medical AI, scalable automated detection remains underdeveloped. We employ unsupervised anomaly detection (AD) and out-of-distribution (OOD) detection as an automated dataset QA mechanism for multi-center dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI. We build a controlled AD benchmark of 17 realistic QA-relevant anomaly types from six public datasets (protocol violations, processing errors, incorrect anatomical regions) and propose a taxonomy of radiological image anomalies based on human visual perception, enabling fine-grained analysis of AD failure modes. The benchmark includes near-, medium-far-, far-OOD samples, as well as in-distribution and external normal data. Four methods are evaluated: a projection-based method extended with a domain-specific feature extractor and a novel positional encoding, a reconstruction-based approach extended to full 3D volumes with an augmented training objective, and two unmodified hybrid OOD detection methods. Medium-far- and far-OOD samples are detected reliably, whereas near-OOD samples and external normal data from unseen institutions expose method-specific differences. The 3D reconstruction-based approach best balances detection performance (AUROC: 0.936) and generalization to unseen institutions. The projection-based method with positional encoding achieves the highest overall detection performance (AUROC: 0.954). Both hybrid methods exhibit critical failure modes, confirming that methods validated for one modality or anatomy may not generalize without domain-specific adaptation. Implants and mastectomies remain an open challenge for all methods. Our results establish a foundation and practical guidance on scalable unsupervised QA in medical AI pipelines.

View source

Similar papers

Jul 2026

Panda: Unsupervised Pelvic Anomaly Detection for Real-Time MR Imaging

A Dinomaly-based unsupervised anomaly detection framework adapted for pelvic MRI that learns normative representations from healthy cases and flags deviations without requiring labels is presented.

Anika Knupfer, M. Lindholz, J. Müller et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Dual-domain adversarial learning and feature constraint for unsupervised anomaly detection in chest X-rays

DualA-AD improves the accuracy for distinguishing normal and abnormal chest X-rays and provides an efficient scheme for fast, low-cost intelligent detection of lung abnormalities, with great potential for computer-aided chest radiographic diagnosis and early prevention and management of pulmonary disorders.

Na Liang, Yehong Tong, Xing Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Reconstruction-Shift Discrimination via Mask-Guided Latent Diffusion for Medical Anomaly Detection

Discriminative mask-guided diffusion is proposed, a medical anomaly detection framework that complements residual-based localization with reconstruction-shift discrimination and achieves the best overall performance among the state-of-the-art baseline methods.

Yibo Wan, Jinyu Cai, Yun-He Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

ReMoE: Report-Guided Mixture-of-Experts for Multimodal OCT/OCTA Anomaly Detection

Report-Guided Mixture-of-Experts (ReMoE) is proposed, which distills normal report semantics into an image-to-text prior student, builds modality-aware priors, and uses Report-Guided Modality Modulation (RMM) to modulate features through mixture-of-experts routing.

Zi-Han Nie, Qin-Cheng Qiao, Muhao Xu et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.