Skip to content
Review Open access

Trust in AI Revisited – The Enduring Role of Propensity to Trust

Jona Karg J. Jäger Petra Maria Asprion
2026 · AHFE International · 0 citations

TL;DR

The present study replicates the path model developed by Karg, Ritz and Asprion (2025) using a business sample to assess the robustness of the original findings and to advance theory building, which largely supports the original findings.

Abstract

The importance of trust in artificial intelligence (AI) continues to grow, as trust is widely regarded as a critical prerequisite for organizational AI adoption. In this context, intention to use AI can be understood as a consequence of the decision to trust AI and is therefore strongly influenced by trust. Moreover, trust is regarded as essential for understanding the impact of increasing interaction with AI systems on both individuals and society. Much of the discussion on trust in AI relies on frameworks derived from trust in automation, but these approaches remain largely theoretical and insufficiently validated. One important empirical contribution addressing this gap is the path model developed by Karg, Ritz and Asprion (2025), which examined trust in ChatGPT using a student sample. This model conceptualizes perceived trustworthiness through performance, process, and purpose. Together with a user’s propensity to trust, these factors are assumed to determine trust in AI. Karg, Ritz and Asprion (2025) demonstrated that perceived trustworthiness is significantly shaped by users’ inherent propensity to trust, in turn, influences the intention to use AI. The present study replicates this path model using a business sample to assess the robustness of the original findings and to advance theory building. An online survey was conducted among 97 employees of a major Swiss bank, employing identical items and methodologies as in the original study. The replication largely supports the original findings. However, in contrast to the original study, performance did not significantly predict trust in AI in the business sample. The findings further reinforce the argument that users’ dispositional characteristics may play a more decisive role in shaping perceived trustworthiness of and trust in AI systems.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Aug 2026

AI Adoption in HRM: Exploring Trust Through Lens of Reliability, Credibility and Technical Competence

Assessing the effects of technology reliability (RL), credibility (CR) and technical competence (TEC) on HR professionals’ trust and, subsequently, their intent to deploy AI tools reveals that technology RL, CR and TEC each enhance trust in AI.

R. Arora, Neha Kumari Siradhana · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Designed to be trusted: anthropomorphism in AI-assisted business decisions

This conceptual and normative paper links together research on anthropomorphism, mental models, trust calibration and AI-assisted decision-making into a single end-to-end chain, proposing a conceptual model with propositions for empirical testing.

Lisa van der Linden · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

The Influence of Different Types of Trust, Perceived Objectivity, and Perceived Risk on the Preferred Involvement of AI for Subjective and Objective Tasks

ABSTRACT Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly involved in decision‐making. While many consumers currently use AI for minor tasks such as music recommendations or for improving writing, it can also be used for more consequential decisions such as medical diagnoses or financial recommendations. A declaration of A...

Fabienne Michel, M. Siegrist · 0 citations
Review Open access 2026

Trust in the machine: Expanding UTAUT with competence trust and user experience in organizational AI platform

As more and more AI-powered tools and platforms are adopted in organizations to automate routine tasks, support decision-making, and improve efficiency, adoption is often lopsided, with employees embracing the system while also wondering whether it can effectively perform work-critical tasks. This study examines how or...

Wittika Thangchan, W. P. Wall · 0 citations

From information fiduciaries to AI: minding the gap of trust

The paper critiques the EU AI Act’s deprioritising human trust, advocating for enhanced individual rights and citizen participation in AI governance, to mitigate trust gaps and the declining role of fiduciary relationships.

M. Unver · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Trusting AI too much? Understanding judgment attenuation in Human–AI decision support systems

It is shown that trust in AI is associated with both the facilitation and the perceived constraint of organizational decision-making, and it highlights accountability as a candidate governance mechanism for preserving self-reported human judgment in AI-assisted environments, pending behavioral validation.

Youngkeun Choi · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.