Skip to content
Open access

Developing Mathematical Models for Interpretability and Safety Verification of AI-Driven Engineering Systems

Jul 2026 · International Journal of Applied Mathematics, Computational Science and Systems Engineering · pp. 87 · 0 citations · 11 references

Abstract

The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is becoming established as a component of safety-critical engineering systems such as the autonomous transportation systems, energy infrastructure, industrial automation, and structural monitoring. As much as AI models and especially deep neural networks prove to be more accurate in prediction, their black box nature create serious issues when it comes to interpretability and safety guarantees. In safety critical areas explainability is not only a good idea, but a precursor to regulatory compliance, accountability and mitigation of hazards. This paper creates a comprehensive mathematical conceptualization of using interpretability metrics and formal safety verification protocols of AI-based engineering systems. Based on the recent developments in explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), mechanistic interpretability, and formal verification theory, we operationalize interpretability as a measurable functional characterization of model structures and safety verification as meet-in-the-middle of reachable state spaces. Our abstraction of causal circuits and verification of time logics constraints using Shapley-based attribution functions make our integrated optimisation model offer explanation fidelity and safety invariants. The framework illustrates how the measures of interpretability can be integrated in the form of the side-constraints in formal verification pipelines, such that the model decision-making can be transparent and safely proven. Findings suggest that the metrics of coupling explanation coupled with reachability analysis can minimize unsafe decision regions and enhance calibration of the trust. The paper adds a mathematically based architecture that can be able to fill in the gap between heuristic XAI methods and serious engineering safety requirements. It is discussed in implications to aerospace, autonomous systems and industrial control environment as well as computational trade-offs and scalability issues. The model suggested creates a direction towards the certifiable AI systems in which interpretability and safety are not set at cross purposes.

Read PDF

Similar papers

2026

Automated Discovery of Finite State Automata for the Control of Discrete Event Systems

In many industrial systems, control-related information is often opaque, undermining the ability to formally ensure safety, correctness, and performance. Representing such systems as Discrete Event Systems (DES) models enables rigorous analysis, synthesis, and correct-by-construction control, but modeling is typically...

Jhonnatan R. Semler, Rosaine F. Semler, M. Wehrmeister et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Large Language Models as Falsifiers for Cyber-Physical Systems

LLM-Falsifier is shown to outperform existing falsification tools based on a range of optimization paradigms, from surrogate-based and Bayesian optimization to search-based testing, on 14 of 21 specifications when measured by the average number of simulations required to find a counterexample.

Ali ArjomandBigdeli, Jia-Wei Zhou, Stanley Bak · 0 citations
#software testing Review Aug 2026

Neuro-Formal Verification: Agentic Language-Agnostic Formal Program Reasoning

Neuro-formal verification is introduced, which harnesses that automation for developers of mainstream programming languages and returns a Dafny proof of correctness or of a bug on 57% of the entries at 92% precision, and a CBMC counterexample for 63% of the buggy programs at 90% precision.

Shuvendu K. Lahiri · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Towards Tackling Application Logic Flaws through Autonomous Formal-Logic Modeling and Automated Reasoning

Logic flaws pose significant challenges in the design and implementation of modern, semantically rich systems and applications, impacting security, privacy, and trust. These flaws are inherently tied to business-specific semantics and threat models, making their discovery and reasoning difficult and hard to scale. Real...

Yi-Wei Fang, Yi-Chen Liu, Ze Jin et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.