Aug 2026· International Journal of Ethics and Systems· 0 citations· 122 references
Abstract
This paper aims to examine how the notion of the common good has evolved within the social sciences, with a particular focus on its application in business ethics and corporate social responsibility. Although scholars often cite the concept, they frequently use it ambiguously or without critical reflection. This study clarifies those shifts and positions the common good as a unifying ethical framework to confront contemporary business and societal challenges.
This paper analyzes 1,690 Web of Science documents (1960–2022) using citation mapping and co-word analysis. This method tracks intellectual structures, thematic clusters and research trends, providing a systematic view of how continuities and transformations shape the discourse on the common good.
This paper identifies three coherent foundational clusters: virtue ethics, Catholic Social Thought and procedural/institutional ethics. Newer interpretations display greater diversity but weaker integration. Six thematic clusters expose persistent tensions between moral agency and structural equity, universal principles and contextual adaptability and ethical imperatives and instrumental outcomes. Sustainability and digital ethics emerge as promising yet underexplored frontiers. Influential works drive much of the debate, but contributions remain uneven across regions and disciplines.
Because of the chosen methodology, the study may underrepresent Global South perspectives and oversimplify complex philosophical debates.
The findings encourage organizations to adopt ethical frameworks beyond environmental, social and governance compliance and urge policymakers to balance grassroots input with institutional accountability.
This paper pioneers bibliometric methods to trace the evolution of the common good, highlighting its coherence and fragmentation and advocating revitalization through interdisciplinary and non-Western perspectives.
The ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) regime has consolidated as the principal normative architecture of corporate activity in Europe. Academic critique of the phenomenon has been predominantly technical—divergence among rating agencies, agency problems, and empirical ineffectiveness—ethical critique remains...
Sustainability has become a central concept in global policy agendas, corporate strategies, and civil society discourse. Yet, despite its ubiquity, the term often functions as a vague ideal, encompassing divergent-and at times conflicting-interests. This study addresses the critical gap in understanding how sustainab...
Elif Saracoğlu· Humanities and Social Scienc...· 0 citations
This paper challenges the dominant utilitarian paradigm of innovation, which reduces technology development to measures of patentability, profitability, and efficiency. Drawing on influential figures in the field of technology philosophy, including Heidegger, Ellul, Feenberg, Ihde, and Stiegler, it makes the case that...
Despite growing its diversity in corporate boardrooms, minority directors may remain marginalized when their representation is not accompanied by meaningful participation and influence. This study clarifies the distinction between symbolic diversity and authentic inclusion to explain why diversity-oriented governance r...
Filipus Adi Kurniawan, Febrine Pentadini, Christina Amanda Savitri· Journal of Management and Bu...· 0 citations
This paper aims to conceptualize ethical infrastructure overconfidence (EIO) as a form of moral disengagement that arises when organizations overestimate the objectivity and self-correcting capacity of digital technologies.
This conceptual theory-building article relies on logical deduction and mechanism ela...
O. Kuran, L. Khabbaz· Society and Business Review· 0 citations