Skip to content

The common good in business ethics: disentangling a crucial concept

Aug 2026 · International Journal of Ethics and Systems · 0 citations · 122 references

Abstract

This paper aims to examine how the notion of the common good has evolved within the social sciences, with a particular focus on its application in business ethics and corporate social responsibility. Although scholars often cite the concept, they frequently use it ambiguously or without critical reflection. This study clarifies those shifts and positions the common good as a unifying ethical framework to confront contemporary business and societal challenges. This paper analyzes 1,690 Web of Science documents (1960–2022) using citation mapping and co-word analysis. This method tracks intellectual structures, thematic clusters and research trends, providing a systematic view of how continuities and transformations shape the discourse on the common good. This paper identifies three coherent foundational clusters: virtue ethics, Catholic Social Thought and procedural/institutional ethics. Newer interpretations display greater diversity but weaker integration. Six thematic clusters expose persistent tensions between moral agency and structural equity, universal principles and contextual adaptability and ethical imperatives and instrumental outcomes. Sustainability and digital ethics emerge as promising yet underexplored frontiers. Influential works drive much of the debate, but contributions remain uneven across regions and disciplines. Because of the chosen methodology, the study may underrepresent Global South perspectives and oversimplify complex philosophical debates. The findings encourage organizations to adopt ethical frameworks beyond environmental, social and governance compliance and urge policymakers to balance grassroots input with institutional accountability. This paper pioneers bibliometric methods to trace the evolution of the common good, highlighting its coherence and fragmentation and advocating revitalization through interdisciplinary and non-Western perspectives.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Jul 2026

«Soft Collectivism»: An Ethical Critique of the ESG Regime

The ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) regime has consolidated as the principal normative architecture of corporate activity in Europe. Academic critique of the phenomenon has been predominantly technical—divergence among rating agencies, agency problems, and empirical ineffectiveness—ethical critique remains...

Alvaro Herrando-Guibert · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

A post-structuralist analysis of sustainability as a new hegemonic identity

Sustainability has become a central concept in global policy agendas, corporate strategies, and civil society discourse. Yet, despite its ubiquity, the term often functions as a vague ideal, encompassing divergent-and at times conflicting-interests. This study addresses the critical gap in understanding how sustainab...

Elif Saracoğlu · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Beyond Utility: Rethinking Innovation through the Lens of Philosophy of Technology

This paper challenges the dominant utilitarian paradigm of innovation, which reduces technology development to measures of patentability, profitability, and efficiency. Drawing on influential figures in the field of technology philosophy, including Heidegger, Ellul, Feenberg, Ihde, and Stiegler, it makes the case that...

Himani Kaushik · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Board Inclusion Beyond Representation: Intellectual Structure, Ethical Foundations, and Future Research Directions

Despite growing its diversity in corporate boardrooms, minority directors may remain marginalized when their representation is not accompanied by meaningful participation and influence. This study clarifies the distinction between symbolic diversity and authentic inclusion to explain why diversity-oriented governance r...

Filipus Adi Kurniawan, Febrine Pentadini, Christina Amanda Savitri · 0 citations
Aug 2026

When technology misleads: a sociotechnical perspective on moral disengagement in business

This paper aims to conceptualize ethical infrastructure overconfidence (EIO) as a form of moral disengagement that arises when organizations overestimate the objectivity and self-correcting capacity of digital technologies. This conceptual theory-building article relies on logical deduction and mechanism ela...

O. Kuran, L. Khabbaz · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.