It is argued that systems engineering must shift from a control‐centric discipline to one grounded in disciplined adaptability, integrating agile principles, model‐based systems engineering, modular open systems architecture, and AI‐enabled capabilities to propose an adaptive systems engineering operating model for sustained mission relevance.
Abstract
Dynamic operational environments and accelerating technological disruption are reshaping how systems engineering must be practiced. Traditional lifecycle models assume stability in requirements and context; however, modern socio‐technical systems particularly those incorporating artificial intelligence operate under persistent uncertainty, rapid feedback cycles, and evolving mission demands. This article argues that systems engineering must shift from a control‐centric discipline to one grounded in disciplined adaptability. Integrating agile principles, model‐based systems engineering (MBSE), modular open systems architecture (MOSA), and AI‐enabled capabilities, the paper proposes an adaptive systems engineering operating model for sustained mission relevance. It differentiates the constraints of hardware, software, and AI‐driven systems, examines AI as both engineering tool and system component, and outlines infrastructure requirements including digital threads, continuous validation architectures, and adaptive governance. A cross‐industry aerospace case study demonstrates how modularity, concurrent engineering, and digital twins enable iterative delivery in safety‐critical domains. Practical guidance is provided for systems engineering practitioners seeking to anticipate and respond effectively to dynamic and uncertain operating environments.
The INCOSE future of systems engineering (FuSE) initiative is a collaborative effort to realize the
Systems Engineering Vision 2035
, pivoting from traditional, process‐driven methods to a more agile approach working with the different engineering and systems engineering disciplines, It focuses on addressing comp...
It is suggested that product line engineering (PLE) provides a structural mechanism for enabling meaningful agility in complex cyber‐physical systems by organizing solutions into stable core assets and controlled variability that explicitly respects physical and organizational constraints.
An interdisciplinary network of influencing factors is derived that makes explicit the dependencies between consistency mechanisms, organizational and technical conditions, and key agility outcomes such as responsiveness, transparency, and the realizability of development increments.
Albert Albers, A. Koziolek, Thomas Alexander Voelk et al.· 0 citations
It is demonstrated that multiple architectural views, continuous monitoring, domain-driven decomposition, and AI-assisted design techniques contribute significantly to improving scalability, maintainability, adaptability, and long-term software sustainability.
An integrated methodology that combines variability modeling principles from SPLE with architectural modularization concepts is proposed, which bridges variability management and modular architecture design to address increasing system complexity in the automotive industry.
Fabian Goihl, Yannick Lindebauer, Richard von Esebeck et al.· Systems· 0 citations
This research contributes to the advancement of smart manufacturing by delivering a holistic roadmap for effective and scalable Industry 4.0 implementation, supporting cross-sector benchmarking, interdisciplinary collaboration, and strategic innovation to accelerate the transition of manufacturing enterprises toward di...
A. Gomaa· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.