Parameter-efficient deep learning for pneumonia detection on chest X-rays: A comparative evaluation of explainable AI methods

Abstract

Pneumonia is a leading cause of infectious disease mortality worldwide, accounting for approximately 2.5 million deaths annually and 15% of deaths in children under five. Chest X-ray imaging remains the primary diagnostic tool, but accurate interpretation requires radiological expertise that is disproportionately concentrated in high-income settings, creating a diagnostic gap where disease burden is highest. Automated deep learning offers a scalable complement to specialist-dependent diagnosis, yet clinical adoption requires both high accuracy and transparent, interpretable reasoning. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have shown strong potential for pneumonia detection from chest X-rays, but two barriers impede clinical translation: the interpretability of black-box models and the computational feasibility of large architectures in resource-constrained settings. Explainable AI (XAI) methods such as Grad-CAM, Grad-CAM++, and Score-CAM address the interpretability barrier, yet systematic quantitative comparisons across multiple CNN architectures remain scarce. Furthermore, CNN architectures widely used for medical image classification carry high parameter counts that limit feasibility in resource-constrained settings, motivating architectures that achieve competitive accuracy with substantially fewer parameters. Here we propose a parameter-efficient deep learning framework for pneumonia detection based on transfer learning, evaluated across three CNN architectures representing distinct architectural families: EfficientNet-B0 with fine-tuning (proposed method), ResNet50, and DenseNet121, trained under identical conditions on the Kaggle chest X-ray dataset (5,863 images). Our method achieved 90% classification accuracy, outperforming both baselines while requiring 4.8x fewer parameters than ResNet50. To evaluate explainability, Grad-CAM, Grad-CAM++, and Score-CAM were applied across all three architectures and compared quantitatively using Intersection over Union against manually annotated lung segmentation masks, Insertion score, and Deletion score, with pairwise statistical validation via Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Bonferroni correction. Findings show that classification accuracy and XAI explanation quality must be evaluated independently, and that the proposed parameter-efficient architecture offers a favorable trade-off for resource-constrained clinical deployment.