Single-cell-derived CAF signatures may reflect sarcoma subtype-specific stromal programs associated with predicted ICB response and clinical outcome, and SIG4 is proposed as a candidate prognostic signature that warrants further validation.
Abstract
Background Sarcomas show heterogeneous responses to immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB), and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are considered to shape the tumor immune microenvironment, yet CAF programs that predict ICB outcomes in sarcoma remain unclear. Methods We investigated the interaction between different cell types in the sarcoma tumor microenvironment and their effects on immune-checkpoint blockade response, with a focus on identifying signature genes and molecular mechanisms that distinguish tumor-promoting from tumor-suppressive CAFs at the single-cell level. We analyzed single-cell data from two different sarcoma cohorts, transcriptome profiles of 206 sarcoma patients recruited from The Cancer Genome Atlas, and predicted immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB) response data inferred using the TIDE algorithm from 64 TCGA sarcoma patients. Results We found 134 stem-like CAF-related signature genes in the recurrent group and eight signature genes in the metastasis group, defining three CAF subtypes (myofibroblastic CAF, antigen-presenting CAF, and inflammatory CAF). SIG134 and SIG8 were associated with TIDE-inferred ICB response in subtype-specific analyses: SIG134 in STLMS and ULMS, and SIG8 in MFS, STLMS, and ULMS. In addition, the MDK-NCL ligand-receptor signal transduction pathway was linked to the infCAF subtype and myoCAFs in metastatic sarcoma. Furthermore, SIG4 (MDK, SDC2, LRP1, and NCL) was highly expressed in inflammatory CAFs. Conclusions Single-cell-derived CAF signatures may reflect sarcoma subtype-specific stromal programs associated with predicted ICB response and clinical outcome. SIG4 is proposed as a candidate prognostic signature that warrants further validation.
This review systematically catalogs the identification methods and signature gene panels for distinct CAF subtypes in prostate cancer, with particular focus on the multilayered regulatory circuits through which these stromal cells shape the immune microenvironment.
Kan-Kan He, Zhi-Te Zhao, Jian-Hui Bai et al.· International Journal on Bio...· 0 citations
An integrated analysis of EwS tumor samples reveals a dynamic tumor–CAF continuum that is uniquely preserved in primary tumors and establishes a framework for identifying clinically relevant tumor-associated surface TAs, providing a foundation for the rational development of next-generation immunotherapies and precisio...
M. Sharif, Abdul S. Khan, R. Brentjens et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
Single-cell transcriptomics of publicly available BLCA data identifies two transcriptionally distinct fibroblast states in adjacent tissue and supports an exploratory ligand–receptor interaction framework, warranting prospective validation with primary CAF populations and adequately powered multi-specimen cohorts.
Yan-Dong He, Wen-Long Lu, Guan-Qun Ju et al.· Frontiers in Cell and Develo...· 0 citations
The constructed RSF model offers a promising computational framework for risk stratification and provides hypothesis-generating insights that may inform future personalized treatment strategies for HCC patients, suggesting a profound link with single-cell metabolic‒immune crosstalk.
These findings define functionally distinct and pharmacologically targetable CAF programs in HNSCC and support stromal-directed interventions as a rational component of future combination treatment strategies.
Llara Prieto-Fernández, A. Martínez-Carrillo, L. de Villalaín et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
CAF abundance is negatively correlated with immune infiltration at the spatial level, with ECM remodeling and FN1-ITGB1 signaling potentially mediating this immune exclusion in melanoma.