Skip to content

Quality of AI-Generated Patient Education for Pre- and Post-Operative Tracheostomy Care.

Aug 2026 · Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery · 0 citations · 25 references
Medicine

TL;DR

AI chatbots can generate accurate and comprehensive responses to common tracheostomy care questions, demonstrating potential to support patient education, but they continue to lack guaranteed, verifiable sourcing.

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the accuracy, completeness, clarity, source transparency, and readability of leading AI chatbot responses to patient questions about tracheostomy and to determine whether AI tools can reliably support patient education where high-quality guidance is critical for safety. STUDY

Design

Cross-sectional content analysis.

Setting

Virtual study environment using publicly accessible AI platforms, with expert evaluation conducted via Qualtrics-based distribution.

Methods

Twelve frequently asked questions about tracheostomy care were identified using search-listening tools and clinician input, then submitted to 5 AI chatbots - ChatGPT4, Google Gemini 2.0, Microsoft Copilot, DeepSeek V3, and Grok 3 - and to a senior laryngologist. Three blinded laryngologists independently evaluated each response using the Quality Analysis of Medical Artificial Intelligence instrument. Readability was assessed using nine metrics.

Results

Gemini 2.0 achieved significantly higher completeness scores than physician responses (P < .001), with DeepSeek and Grok 3 (P < .05) also outperforming (P < .05). Accuracy did not differ significantly between AI- and expert-generated responses. On average, the AI models outperformed physician in clarity, completeness, and usefulness based on QAMAI scoring (P < .05). All AI and expert responses exceeded the NIH-recommended 6th-grade reading level, ranging from 10th-13th grade (P < .001). Inter-rater reliability was 78%.

Conclusion

AI chatbots can generate accurate and comprehensive responses to common tracheostomy care questions, demonstrating potential to support patient education. However, they continue to lack guaranteed, verifiable sourcing, and this study did not assess actual patient comprehension of the AI-generated responses. Future efforts should focus on adapting AI-generated education materials to meet health literacy standards and evaluating their direct impact on patient understanding and outcomes.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Jul 2026

Evaluating the reliability, quality, and readability of AI-generated patient education on hallux valgus: a comparative study of large language models

Patients with hallux valgus increasingly seek health information through consumer-facing artificial intelligence (AI)–driven patient education tools, particularly large language model–based conversational agents. Although these tools offer rapid and accessible responses, concerns remain regarding the reliability,...

A. Koluman, Ebru Aloğlu Çiftçi, Mehmet Utku Çiftçi et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Evaluating the Role of AI Chatbots in Patient Education for Benign Scrotal Surgeries

Patient comprehension of surgical information is often limited by medical jargon, health literacy barriers, and time constraints. Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT‐5, Claude‐4, and Google AI search offer interactive context specific dialogue that may aid to overcome these limitations. To date, no study has...

Darcy Noll, T. Milton, P. Stapleton et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Evaluating AI-generated patient education materials for endometrial cancer surgery: a comparative analysis of response quality, reliability, and readability between ChatGPT and DeepSeek models

DeepSeek demonstrates a significant advantage in information reliability, particularly excelling in postoperative and follow-up management content, and ChatGPT shows a slight edge in the readability of surgical planning sections.

Ling Tian, Long-Yue Tang, Ming-Tao Yang et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Comparing the readability of AI-generated and society-authored patient information leaflets in orthopaedics

AI-generated PILs offer brevity but do not consistently improve readability, with some indices suggesting increased complexity, and clinician oversight and further validation are essential to ensure AI-generated materials enhance, rather than hinder, patient understanding and engagement.

N. Kharma, S. Gill, Chayan Shanmugaratnam et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Artificial Intelligence in Bariatric Patient Education: A Multi-rater Evaluation of Reliability, Readability, and Clinical Validity of ChatGPT 5.2

Background: Although artificial intelligence (AI) has been used in patient education for some time, the accuracy, reliability, and clinical appropriateness of AI-generated medical content remain inadequately defined and continue to be debated. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability, readability, and comprehensibi...

Furkan Türkoğlu, Elif Nur Gencer, Emre Erdoğan · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.