Jul 2026· Ibero Ciencias - Revista Científica y Académica - ISSN 3072-7197· Vol 5, pp. 4723-4735· 0 citations· 38 references
TL;DR
AI/ML systems demonstrate substantial diagnostic potential for dental caries, frequently matching clinician performance, and critical gaps persist regarding multicenter validation, clinically interpretable models, and prospective trials evaluating patient outcomes.
Abstract
Objective: To systematically evaluate the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) models for the detection and classification of dental caries across different imaging modalities. Review methodology: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar covering publications from January 2015 through March 2026. Studies reporting quantitative performance metrics for AI/ML models applied to caries detection, classification, or segmentation were included. A three-stage screening process (title, abstract, full-text) was applied following PRISMA guidelines. Results: A total of 45 studies were included. Deep learning, particularly convolutional neural networks, constituted the predominant approach (~69%). The most employed architectures include the YOLO family (v3–v11), U-Net variants, and transfer-learning classifiers (ResNet, VGG, DenseNet, EfficientNet, MobileNet). Reported accuracy ranged from 73.3% to 98.6%, with pooled meta-analytic sensitivity of 0.85 and specificity of 0.90. Only 12% of studies used public datasets. Conclusions: AI/ML systems demonstrate substantial diagnostic potential for dental caries, frequently matching clinician performance. Critical gaps persist regarding multicenter validation, clinically interpretable models, and prospective trials evaluating patient outcomes.
Background Oro-Facial Pain (OFP) disorders are a group of diseases characterized by overlapping clinical features leading to diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) such as machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have shown potential to improve the accuracy of diagnos...
S. Khanagar, Areej A. Alfaifi, Oinam Gokulchandra Singh et al.· Frontiers in Oral Health· 0 citations
This study is among the first few reproducible benchmark studies for CNNs on the Caries_Spectra dataset that involves repeated cross-validation, multi-seed testing, statistical comparison, computational profiling, and explainability studies.
Komal Vyas, D. Nawgaje, Ashwini Deshmukh· Discover Imaging· 0 citations
It is concluded that the use of AI and DL can have a positive impact on the care of patients with lung cancer, but further research and regulation are required to ensure its quality and reliability.
Current data suggest that AI may serve as a valuable adjunct to clinical decision-making, with potential to reduce diagnostic variability and support non-specialist practitioners.
M. Visconti, M. Bornstein, A. R. Santos-Silva et al.· Brazilian Oral Research· 1 citation
The diagnostic solutions offered by the present artificial intelligence (AI) solutions suffer from non-generalizability and heavy reliance on complex models. In an attempt to solve these issues, we propose a lightweight yet versatile method consisting of a combination of ResNet50 transfer learning and hybrid machine le...
Karan Singh, A. Pawar, Drishya Tomar et al.· International Journal of Inf...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.