Skip to content
Open access

A PRACTICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING AI CHATBOTS IN NON-ENGLISH DRUG INFORMATION SERVICES

Jul 2026 · Thai Bulletin of Pharmaceutical Sciences · Vol 21, pp. 251-261 · 0 citations

TL;DR

It is suggested that AI chatbot competency in drug-related queries is broadly comparable to that of pharmacists, and the proposed evaluation framework provides a potential model for assessing AI competency in non-English settings.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence, particularly AI-based chatbots, has gained increasing attention as a tool to support pharmacists in providing drug information services, especially in settings with pharmacist shortages. This study compared the competencies of ChatGPT, ChatGPT Pro, Perplexity, and Perplexity Pro in responding to drug-related clinical questions, and examined the effect of an Enhanced Task Translation (ETT) technique on chatbot performance, after English technical terms were embedded with Thai-language prompts. An experimental comparative design was employed. Two sets of Thai-language multiple-choice questions (MCQs), each comprising 120 items based on the Thai Pharmacy Licensing Examination, were administered: one standard set and one ETT set. Cardiology-focused clinical case scenarios were additionally presented using a SOAP-note format. Performance was assessed using a rubric adapted from the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) guidelines across four domains: question classification, source citation, evidence application, and communication. All four chatbots surpassed the 60% passing threshold: 72.08–83.33% for the standard set and 73.75–80.83% for the ETT set. Perplexity Pro demonstrated the highest MCQ performance, while the inclusion of English technical terms did not consistently improve results across models. In the clinical case assessment, ChatGPT Pro achieved the highest rubric score, showing strong evidence use and clinical reasoning. These findings suggest that AI chatbot competency in drug-related queries is broadly comparable to that of pharmacists. The ETT technique did not produce notable performance differences between Thai-only and mixed-language prompts. AI chatbots may support pharmacists by generating initial structured responses to drug information requests. The proposed evaluation framework provides a potential model for assessing AI competency in non-English settings and underscores the importance of jointly evaluating knowledge accuracy and clinical judgment to ensure safe integration into drug information services.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

A real‐world analysis of AI chatbot performance for medicines information enquiries

The study results demonstrated the chatbots' responses were typically suboptimal; albeit, a significant minority prompted a follow up to review the chatbot response, and the study conforms with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Duncan Yorkston, Tracey Borrie, Paul K. L. Chin · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

AI Chatbots as a source of Ramadan medication management advice for patients with diabetes: a multilingual comparative evaluation

While most responses aligned with the IDF-DAR guideline, some harmful recommendations persisted, and response consistency fluctuated over time, the results suggest that AI chatbots should serve as a supplementary resource rather than a substitute for professional medical advice.

S. Alomair, Maryam Alsuwayq, Walaa Alabbad et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Development of an AI-driven chatbot for medication-assisted treatment standards in Scotland

This study provides the first prototype of an AI-driven chatbot specifically designed for MAT professionals, demonstrating feasibility of integrating advanced AI technologies to address information access barriers in addiction treatment.

Sandra C. Nwobi, Zainab Loukil, Abbas Jawahar · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Multilingual Conversational AI Chatbots for Efficient Healthcare Delivery During Case History-Taking: A Systematic Review

Multilingual AI chatbots demonstrate a boost in healthcare efficiency, a reduction in language barriers, and the promotion of health equity, but exhibit challenges regarding validation, workflow integration, and evaluation standards, along with ethical issues such as privacy and bias.

R. Sharanesha, Deepti Virupakshappa, A. Abushanan et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Assessing the Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Medical Information Retrieval: A Structured Query-based Evaluation

Findings indicate that freely available AI chatbots may provide rapid drug information but show variable accuracy, and their responses should be verified against authoritative clinical references before use in healthcare education or practice.

S. Dhohan, Gagan D. Urs, K. Sneha et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Evaluation of chatbot and specialist knowledge on pediatric sedation and general anesthesia: a comparative analysis

While the chatbot models showed high proficiency in data retrieval for “General Information” and “Postoperative Monitoring,” anesthesiologists significantly outperformed the AI models in “Patient Evaluation and Preparation”, highlighting a critical gap in AI’s clinical reasoning compared to human expertise.

Dilara Dinc, Aslıhan Ozbilgen · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.