YOLO-PEFT is proposed, a structure-aware framework that formulates adapter placement as an auditable constraint-planning problem that replaces manual target-module trial and error with explicit, inspectable planning while preserving verified train-save-merge-export paths.
Abstract
Generic parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods transferred from language models can fail silently on real-time detectors, whose heterogeneous operators and detection-specific components impose placement constraints absent from regular Transformer stacks. We propose YOLO-PEFT, a structure-aware framework that formulates adapter placement as an auditable constraint-planning problem. Given a detector graph, a PEFT request, and a resource budget, YOLO-PEFT assigns operator and semantic roles, evaluates explicit operator-validity, detector-semantic, graph-interface, and deployment predicates, records a reason code for each excluded module, and either emits a budgeted target-module plan or returns Refuse before training. Under the official VOC07+12 trainval-to-VOC07 test protocol, planner-selected RS-LoRA reaches 0.7138 and 0.7307 mAP50-95 on YOLO11s and YOLO12s, respectively, compared with 0.6428 and 0.6662 for Full-SFT. On RT-DETR-L, all seven evaluated LoRA-family configurations cross the predefined catastrophic threshold, supporting a calibrated Refuse-to-Full-SFT decision within the evaluated coverage. A controlled YOLO11 audit further shows that LoRA reduces peak training memory by 43.9 percent, although training takes 1.72 times longer. Within the evaluated detector families, placement policies, and calibration coverage, YOLO-PEFT replaces manual target-module trial and error with explicit, inspectable planning while preserving verified train-save-merge-export paths; refusal on unseen detector architectures remains an open validation problem. Project Page: github.com/Tencent/YOLO-Master
Engram Adapter, a framework that repurposes pretraining-time conditional memory as a post-hoc adapter for frozen LLMs, improves in-domain accuracy while preserving 99.4%--100.1% of average OOD performance; on LegalBench it slightly exceeds the frozen base model on average, whereas comparable always-on baselines degrade...
EDA flow parameter tuning is critical for quality-of-results~(QoR), yet the parameter space is large, tightly coupled, and full evaluations are prohibitively expensive. Prior LLM-assisted tuners mainly use the LLM as an external proposer with transient working context; we instead present \textbf{StateTune}, which refor...
Kunlong Li, Shangshang Yao, Su Zheng et al.· 0 citations
A three-stage fine-tuning curriculum applied to Qwen3-27B is described that is designed to progressively specialize the model for the C-to-Rust (C2Rust) translation task, and the resulting model is evaluated using the agentic, static-analysis-guided verification framework of SACTOR.
Pu Zhao, Changdi Yang, Yixiao Chen et al.· 0 citations
Natural-language descriptions of optimization problems may be incomplete or vague about numerical information that a solver requires, including costs, capacities, demands, bounds, and penalties. A language model can translate the description into code, but when a required value is absent it must either stop or guess. W...
Shaghayegh Sadeghi, Steve Smith, D. C. Del Rey Fernández· 0 citations
AuroSFT is introduced, a parameter-efficient framework that recasts the carried state of overfitting-aware multi-task SFT as a compact, mergeable adapter state and obtains higher accuracy on all five backbones.
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures provide an efficient paradigm for scaling large language models (LLMs), yet fixed top-k routing activates the same number of expert slots for every token, causing substantial redundant computation. Existing expert-skipping methods often rely on router confidence, calibration data,...
Zu-Kang Xu, Zhi-Xiong Zhao, Xing Hu et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.