Skip to content

Neural Collapse Is Forbidden: Information Floors in Language Models

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.09487 · 0 citations · 20 references
Computer Science Mathematics

TL;DR

It is argued that within-class variance in language-model representations is allocated information storage, and that the allocation obeys a law, and that the allocation obeys a law.

Abstract

Within-class variance in language-model representations is commonly read as incomplete neural collapse. We argue it is allocated information storage, and that the allocation obeys a law. A one-line centering identity voids a family of simplex equiangular-tight-frame claims, including our own earlier ones; in dimensionless variance shares across 14 models, macro-category structure carries only 4-12% of representational variance and within-token context carries 79-91%, stable across a 100x parameter range. On the theory side, token-level weight decay penalizes a category in proportion to its type count, not its occurrence mass, reducing next-token prediction to an imbalanced K-class problem whose optimum orders category norms by type count. A converse floor, proved for binary categories, forces within-category dispersion to be at least proportional to the conditional mutual information I(token; context | category). The law holds: identity dispersion, not total variance, tracks this information across every tested model and partition, under a model-free estimate and even across models, where one model's information predicts another's dispersion; and over pretraining the category share overshoots, decays, and partially recovers, because the information it must carry never left.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Attention-Path Fragility as an Uncertainty Signal in Large Language Models

It is proposed that a model's uncertainty about a token is reflected not only in the breadth of its output distribution but also in whether a confident prediction is \emph{fragile} under perturbation of its attention pathways, a training-free estimator that masks attention heads and measures the BALD mutual information...

Minsoo Kim, Sungyoung Ji, Kisung Moon et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Bayesian Repetition Penalty: A Principled Adjacent-Conditional Framework for Reversing Attention Collapse in Autoregressive Language Models

This work presents a principled framework that penalises or compensates anomalous confidence arising from collapsed generation patterns, by comparing a token's observed frequency against its corpus prior through an adjacent-conditional probability construction.

Wenjie Fan, Bin Ma, Dong Li · 0 citations
Jul 2026

The JEPA Paradox in Language: The Geometry of Linguistic Alternatives

Text-compatible JEPA objectives must preserve multiple plausible completions rather than compress them into a single latent point, showing that text-compatible JEPA objectives must preserve multiple plausible completions rather than compress them into a single latent point.

A. T. D. Dinh, K. Vo · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Decodable But Not Detachable: Training Data Granularity Determines Parametric Modularity in Large Language Models

This work applies a uniform causal methodology across two domain granularities, three model families, and eight domains to identify domain-specific parametric shells: concentrated, causally necessary neuron populations whose removal selectively degrades a target domain while sparing others.

M. Armstrong, Navid Ayoobi, Arjun Mukherjee · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Mapping and Measuring the Behavioral Evolution of Large Language Models

An architecture-agnostic sufficient condition is established linking behavioral similarity to inference-prompt coverage, small excess population log-loss, and similar effective target distributions---a possible training-side account rather than an empirical explanation of the observed trends.

Dong Qiao, Chris Ding, Jicong Fan · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Rewriting or Reweighting? A Geometric Account in Language Models

Behavior manifold analysis is introduced, which isolates behavior-specific geometry by selecting sparse behavior-associated coordinates and lifting them into low-dimensional local charts, and provides a unified framework for understanding the mechanistic distinction between the two objectives.

Jun-Tong Wang, Shengkun Yang, Xiyuan Wang et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.