Skip to content
Open access

Software quality assurance in the era of Agentic AI: a systematic mapping study

Aug 2026 · Frontiers of Computer Science · 0 citations · 38 references

TL;DR

Examination of Agentic AI integration in SQA examines Agentic AI integration in SQA, analyzing application distribution, agent characteristics, and supported stakeholder roles to identify coverage, trends, benefits, limitations, and gaps.

Abstract

The growing complexity of software systems has increased demand for intelligent solutions in Software Quality Assurance (SQA). Agentic Artificial Intelligence (AI) offers autonomous decision-making, adaptive behavior, and proactive quality improvement, yet its applications across SQA remain fragmented. This systematic mapping study examines Agentic AI integration in SQA, analyzing application distribution, agent characteristics, and supported stakeholder roles to identify coverage, trends, benefits, limitations, and gaps. Following systematic mapping protocols and PRISMA, five digital libraries were searched, retrieving 37 primary studies. Data were classified through frequency analysis and qualitative categorization aligned with Agentic AI behavior, architecture, and autonomy dimensions. Applications concentrate in Product Assurance, mainly test generation and defect management, with fewer studies in Process or Planning activities. Most agents exhibit goal-oriented or diagnostic behaviors, moderate autonomy, and hybrid or multi-agent architectures. Benefits include efficiency, accuracy, and maintainability improvements; limitations involve scalability, generalizability, and transparency. Role coverage focuses on execution-level stakeholders, while managerial and leadership roles receive minimal support. Agentic AI shows potential for strengthening SQA intelligence and adaptability but remains unevenly distributed across activities and roles. Transparency, validation, and leadership support are priority research gaps for developing trustworthy, process-aware Agentic systems across the full SQA lifecycle.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Jul 2026

Implementing agentic AI in project management: an evidence-based framework and maturity model from systematic analysis

This study develops an evidence-based implementation framework and maturity model for organizations adopting agentic artificial intelligence in project management, synthesizing insights from academic research and industry implementations, and provides an organizational performance measurement framework with validated K...

Ravi Kalluri · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Challenges and Contributions in Quality of AI-Based Software: A Systematic Mapping Study

A Systematic Mapping Study on the quality of AI-based software identifies six recurring challenge categories, with the most prominent being limitations in existing quality assessment models followed by issues in non-functional requirement management, quality-aware development, and quality assurance.

Maryum Hamdani, Mateen Ahmed Abbasi, Marko Jäntti et al. · 0 citations
Conference Aug 2026

Agentic Validation of AI System Requirements: A Hybrid Architecture for Regulatory Compliance

AI systems face growing demands driven by both technical complexity and the legal obligations introduced by the EU AI Act. Requirements Engineering (RE) currently lacks systematic tooling to validate project-level quality requirements against these legal obligations in a traceable, auditable, and scalable manner. This...

T. Y. Emmy Lai · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Developing LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems in Software Engineering: A Mixed-Method Experience Report

A comprehensive overview of the existing tools and frameworks for implementing MAS in software engineering and a set of lessons learned and challenges that can help researchers and practitioners to select a suitable MAS framework according to their needs are provided.

Maria Sâmyla Serafim de Oliveira, M. Ibiyo, Marco Gianrusso et al. · 1 citation
Open access Aug 2026

Integrated intelligence, autonomous operations, and trusted autonomy: AI-driven SCM performance in 2040

A SCOR-DS-wide, Delphi-based analysis of how AI-driven SCM performance enhancement is expected to unfold by 2040 as a layered, process-uneven configuration rather than a single linear trend shows that these trajectories operate through distinct mechanisms.

Wolf Frenkler, M. Wimmer, Christoph Küffner et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.