Skip to content
Open access

Admission-based predictors of in-hospital AKI in HFrEF: a single-centre retrospective study

Oct 2026 · Frontiers in Physiology · Vol 17 · 0 citations · 30 references
Medicine

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to construct and internally validate a concise prediction model for in-hospital acute kidney injury (AKI) among patients admitted with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The model was limited to information available at hospital presentation. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 1,071 HFrEF hospitalizations at the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from September 2020 to September 2022. The outcome was incident AKI during the index admission, defined using a modified KDIGO (48-h serum creatinine) criterion, based on an increase of ≥26.5 µmol/L within 48 h. Candidate variables measured at admission were screened with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression using the 1−SE rule. Bootstrap stability and clinical parsimony were then considered to preserve temporal validity and bedside usability. Internal validation was performed using 5-fold stratified out-of-fold cross-validation. Results In-hospital AKI occurred in 118 of the 1,071 patients (11.0%). Five key on-admission clinical parameters were identified as the strongest predictors: age, furosemide-equivalent dose, hypotension on presentation, RDW, eGFR. In internal validation, the combination of these five strictly admission-based parameters achieved an AUC-ROC of 0.81 [95% bootstrap confidence interval (CI): 0.77–0.85], a precision-recall AUC (PR-AUC) of 0.47, a Brier score of 0.08, a calibration intercept of −0.02, and a calibration slope of 0.98. Decision curve analysis demonstrated clinical utility with a positive net benefit across most clinically plausible decision thresholds. Conclusion A five-predictor model based entirely on admission data can provide interpretable early risk stratification for in-hospital AKI in patients hospitalized with HFrEF. By excluding post-admission treatment responses and weight change, the model reduces reverse-causality bias and may support renal safety decisions at the time of presentation.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.