ADSL-PDE improves both search efficiency and optimization stability, achieving an improvement of more than 52% within the first ten evolution iterations, suggesting a broader principle for LLM-driven auto-design: effective agents do not merely require stronger reasoning, but rather a search representation that concentrates exploration on valid and consequential decisions.
Abstract
Neural PDE solver auto-design is fundamentally a search-space representation problem. In the space of unrestricted Python programs, valid solvers form an extremely sparse subset: most candidate programs are syntactically incorrect, semantically incompatible, or numerically unstable. Direct code generation therefore forces an LLM to spend most of its search capacity navigating implementation failures rather than reasoning about solver quality. ADSL-PDE addresses this challenge by introducing a structured search state between solver concepts and executable code. It represents the functional decisions that determine a neural PDE solver (architecture, physical constraints, objectives, sampling, and optimization) while abstracting away low-level implementation details. A deterministic compiler maps each valid search state to an executable solver. In effect, ADSL-PDE reshapes the search space: it removes large regions of invalid programs, increases the density of meaningful candidates, and preserves the compositional freedom needed to discover previously unseen designs. Solver evolution can thus operate over design decisions rather than code artifacts. Built on this representation, our evolutionary agent iteratively proposes, evaluates, and refines solver search states using empirical feedback. Across multiple PDE benchmarks, ADSL-PDE improves both search efficiency and optimization stability, achieving an improvement of more than 52% within the first ten evolution iterations. These results suggest a broader principle for LLM-driven auto-design: effective agents do not merely require stronger reasoning, but rather a search representation that concentrates exploration on valid and consequential decisions.
The PDE-Controller formalizes informal PDEs, synthesizes solver-ready code, and plans subgoals to tackle nonconvex con-trol via interactions with external solvers, and the Lean Finder accelerates PDE formalization via a semantics-aware search engine for Lean/Mathlib that retrieves relevant theorems.
Wu-Yang Chen· Proceedings of the Thirty-Fi...· 0 citations
A solver-informed diagnosis mechanism that exploits fine-grained solver statistics as verbal gradients for targeted refinement and a structured memory abstracts prior experience into reusable modeling strategies, avoiding redundant exploration while enabling zero-shot transfer to unseen problems and bootstrapping small...
Haofeng Yuan, Jianing Peng, Jieyi Bi et al.· 0 citations
EvoPINN is proposed, an agentic framework that reformulates PINN development from labor-intensive manual design into a rigorous, execution-grounded algorithm discovery problem, and autonomously invented SLRC-PINN, a novel architecture whose performance gains persist under rigorous parameter-matched comparisons.
Peng Yin, Kai Li, Yifan Zhang et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
Simulation is central to modern engineering and science, but the cost of numerical solvers for partial differential equations (PDEs) remains a bottleneck whenever fast or many-query evaluations are required. Neural emulators trained on solver-generated data promise significant speedups, yet they are usually framed as o...
Despite decades of intensive research and optimization, modern Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) solvers have reached a plateau where significant performance gains are increasingly difficult to achieve. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in pattern recognition and code generation fo...
Mao Luo, Hang Ding, Chumin Li et al.· Proceedings of the Thirty-Fi...· 0 citations
Natural-language descriptions of optimization problems may be incomplete or vague about numerical information that a solver requires, including costs, capacities, demands, bounds, and penalties. A language model can translate the description into code, but when a required value is absent it must either stop or guess. W...
Shaghayegh Sadeghi, Steve Smith, D. C. Del Rey Fernández· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.