This work examines how LLMs interact with physical knowledge, numerical methods, and computational feedback to formulate models, implement solution procedures, and guide design and control in LLM-assisted PDE research across three stages, including discovery, solving, and optimization.
Abstract
Numerical methods and deep learning have advanced the modelling and simulation of systems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs), while formulating equations, configuring solvers, and translating simulations into design and control decisions continue to demand substantial domain expertise and computational resources. Large language models (LLMs) offer opportunities to automate and coordinate these tasks by combining scientific knowledge, mathematical reasoning, code generation, and tool use. Here we review LLM-assisted PDE research across three stages, including discovery, solving, and optimization. We examine how LLMs interact with physical knowledge, numerical methods, and computational feedback to formulate models, implement solution procedures, and guide design and control. We also review existing benchmarks and evaluation practices for assessing scientific validity, computational performance, and workflow reliability. Finally, we discuss three interconnected challenges and opportunities: developing mathematical and physical reasoning tailored to specific PDE problems; building transferable domain expertise through domain-specific and multimodal post-training; and integrating active experimental design with scientific validation for open-ended problems. These directions outline a path towards a more substantive role for LLMs in developing and testing scientific ideas and computational methods across PDE research.
A hybrid architecture combining Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) with operator learning techniques to efficiently solve nonlinear PDEs governing blood flow in viscoelastic arteries, with emphasis on the influence of external magnetic fields and genomic-scale parameter variations is proposed.
C. Manigandan, S. Jeyarani, S.Selvakumar et al.· International journal of com...· 0 citations
A Physics Constraint‐Guided Network (PCGN) for deep PDE solving is proposed, to introduce physical information at three levels: feature representation, optimization, and output correction.
A verifier-guided neural-to-symbolic methodology for interpretable and physically auditable forecasting in the natural sciences is established, establishing a verifier-guided neural-to-symbolic methodology for interpretable and physically auditable forecasting in the natural sciences.
The PDE-Controller formalizes informal PDEs, synthesizes solver-ready code, and plans subgoals to tackle nonconvex con-trol via interactions with external solvers, and the Lean Finder accelerates PDE formalization via a semantics-aware search engine for Lean/Mathlib that retrieves relevant theorems.
Wu-Yang Chen· Proceedings of the Thirty-Fi...· 0 citations
Two Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN)-based surrogate frameworks tailored to distinct applications achieving speedups exceeding three orders of magnitude over a conventional numerical solver, with sub-percent mean absolute percentage errors and strong generalization to extrapolated inputs beyond their training dom...
Sepehr Aarabi Dahej, Anthony W. K. Quarshie, C. L. Swartz et al.· Industrial & Engineering...· 0 citations
Simulation is central to modern engineering and science, but the cost of numerical solvers for partial differential equations (PDEs) remains a bottleneck whenever fast or many-query evaluations are required. Neural emulators trained on solver-generated data promise significant speedups, yet they are usually framed as o...
Felix Koehler· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.