This paper studies general equilibrium when households and firms choose price-contingent schedules and market clearing determines prices. A unilateral schedule change therefore changes both an agent's realized allocation and the price at which it is evaluated. We call the resulting outcome a schedule equilibrium. The central object is the response of the clearing price to an agent's own schedule. This residual price response enters the household and firm first-order conditions, provides the strategic component of markups, and links conduct to observable equilibrium variation. We give conditions for existence, derive a trembling-hand refinement, and show how competitive, Cournot, and supply-function models arise as special cases. Applications to monopoly and vertical market power show how general-equilibrium feedback can alter familiar partial-equilibrium conclusions. We then allow firm mass, ownership, and technology to be endogenous. Free entry need not be efficient because entrants do not internalize their effect on the rest of the economy. Households choose capitalization and thereby ownership and firm creation, while investment moves active firms through production-function space. The same price-response mechanism therefore links market power, entry, ownership, and technological change within a common general-equilibrium framework.
This paper develops a framework for individualized treatment allocation when interventions shift equilibrium prices and generate spillovers across treated and untreated units. The planner chooses which units receive a subsidy while allowing equilibrium prices to adjust endogenously. We show that the resulting welfare f...
We study a model of price competition in a homogeneous good market where consumers may be fully rational or inattentive to small price differences. At the beginning, firms are pricing at marginal cost, and receive a stochastic signal concerning consumers’ rationality. They then compete for two periods, observing the ma...
Ottorino Chillemi, Stefano Galavotti· JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS· 0 citations
We study a three-firm market following the breakdown of an initially complete cartel, taking both the breakdown and the identity of the departing firm as exogenously given. In the baseline model, the former cartel members no longer coordinate: all three firms choose quantities simultaneously and non-cooperatively. Thus...
Anton Badev, Vanya Ivanova, Diana Nedelcheva et al.· Foundations· 0 citations
We study a duopoly in which firms and consumers do not know which product better fits consumers'needs. Consumers begin with a default seller, privately know their switching costs, and may pay to acquire a private signal about product fit. Search determines which evidence is acquired; switching determines whether it app...
Online sellers increasingly delegate pricing to rules that respond mechanically to rivals’ posted prices. This paper studies such rules in a differentiated Bertrand model in which a seller’s pricing technology is a response speed and a rule slope, and shows that rivals’ technologies enter a seller’s problem only throug...
Maya Collins, Adrian Foster· Digital Enterprise Studies· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.