Skip to content
Open access

Enhanced Retrieval of Spring Snow Depth Over Pan‐Arctic Sea Ice From AMSR2 Observations for 2013–2023 Using Multi‐Model Machine Learning

Jul 2026 · Journal of Geophysical Research · Vol 3 · 0 citations · 29 references

TL;DR

A multi‐model machine learning (ML) framework for retrieving spring snow depth over Arctic sea ice from Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2 (AMSR2) is developed and a daily snow depth record for March–April from 2013 to 2023 is generated.

Abstract

Snow on sea ice modulates the Earth's radiation budget and sea ice mass balance, yet satellite retrievals of Arctic snow depth remain subject to substantial algorithmic uncertainty. We develop a multi‐model machine learning (ML) framework for retrieving spring snow depth over Arctic sea ice from Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2 (AMSR2). Three structurally distinct ML models are trained with high‐resolution airborne measurements from the Alfred Wegener Institute IceBird campaigns in April 2017 and 2019. Evaluation using a composite airborne data set from NASA's Operation IceBridge for spring 2013–2015 yields correlation coefficients of 0.66–0.70 and mean errors of 0.1–0.3 cm across the three models. A performance‐weighted fusion scheme is then introduced to combine the three ML models into a merged framework (AMSR2‐Merged) and generate a daily snow depth record for March–April from 2013 to 2023. Independent validation against ground‐based observations during the MOSAiC expedition shows a mean error of 0.16 cm for AMSR2‐Merged, with error reductions of 50%–98% relative to established empirical algorithms and 16%–88% relative to individual ML models. Over the study period, regionally averaged spring snow depths range from ∼15 to 23 cm in the Barents Sea to ∼23–25 cm in the central Arctic Ocean, with the largest interannual variability reaching ∼5 cm. Notably, the Arctic‐wide spring snow depth is ∼10 ± 5 cm lower than that in the Warren climatology (1954–1991). The uncertainty of AMSR2‐Merged ranges from ∼2.5 to 6 cm and peaks in the marginal ice zones, where AMSR2 data and inter‐model spread are the dominant sources.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Robust Regional Contrast but Penetration‐Sensitive Snow Thickness Over Sea Ice From Multi‐Winter Antarctic CRYO2ICE Observations

Snow on Antarctic sea ice modulates albedo, thermodynamic growth, and snow–ice formation, yet remains a leading uncertainty in altimetry‐derived sea‐ice thickness. Here we use the post‐2022 CRYO2ICE configuration to derive along‐track winter snow thickness from ICESat‐2 laser and CryoSat‐2 Ku‐band radar freeboards over...

Xinlong Liu, Alexander D. Fraser, R. Tilling et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Utilizing NASA's Operation IceBridge Airborne SWE and Precipitation Products to Assess Surface Snow Over Alaskan Glaciers

Accurately estimating Snow Water Equivalent (SWE) in glacierized regions is critical for glacier modeling and mass balance analysis yet remains challenging due to sparse observations and uncertainties in precipitation products. The objectives are twofold: (a) assess how well three widely used precipitation datasets—Sta...

Yang Song, A. Behrangi · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Arctic Snow Density Retrieval from AMSR-2 Passive Microwave Brightness Temperatures: A Comparative Evaluation of Machine-Learning and Deep-Learning Models

The evaluated models could reproduce ERA5-referenced Arctic snow-density patterns, but their performance partly reflected regional information, and ERA5 showed limited consistency with station-based Northern Hemisphere Snow Water Equivalent estimates.

Jianjun Zhang, Wentao Zhou, Shuhu Yang et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

First Assessment of ICESat‐2 Summer Sea Ice Freeboard With Airborne Validation

ICESat‐2 has demonstrated solid performance in retrieving sea ice freeboard during winter, when sea ice surface types are well‐defined and leads provide reliable sea surface height references. Summer retrievals are challenging because melt ponds are not explicitly distinguished in the ATL07 surface classification and m...

Ellen M. Buckley, S. Kacimi, Melinda A. Webster et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.