Skip to content
Review Open access

Neuroinflammation in major depressive disorder: Mechanisms, biomarkers, and emerging therapeutic targets

Aug 2026 · World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews · 0 citations

TL;DR

Overall, the findings suggest that neuroinflammation represents a promising and increasingly actionable target for biomarker-guided, personalized psychiatric care.

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) affects an estimated 280 million people worldwide and remains a leading cause of disability. The monoamine hypothesis, and later the neuroplasticity hypothesis, transformed treatment but leave a substantial share of patients with delayed response, partial remission, or outright treatment resistance. Over the past two decades, evidence has accumulated that a subset of MDD is driven by chronic, low-grade neuroinflammation rather than, or in addition to, monoaminergic deficits. This review synthesizes current evidence on the neuroimmune mechanisms involved in MDD microglial activation, pro-inflammatory cytokine signaling, blood–brain barrier disruption, oxidative stress, kynurenine pathway dysregulation, and impaired neuroplasticity and examines how these mechanisms are captured by peripheral, central, neuroimaging, and emerging molecular biomarkers. It then reviews therapeutic strategies that target inflammation directly (minocycline, celecoxib, TNF-α antagonists), indirectly (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), ketamine), or through lifestyle modification (exercise, diet, sleep), with attention to why inflammation-stratified trials have outperformed unstratified ones. Across mechanisms, biomarkers, and treatment response, a consistent pattern emerges: neuroinflammation does not simply co-occur with depression, it may mark a biologically distinct, identifiable subtype roughly a quarter to a third of patients with elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) or IL-6 for whom anti-inflammatory or immune-modulating strategies produce disproportionate benefit. Overall, the findings suggest that neuroinflammation represents a promising and increasingly actionable target for biomarker-guided, personalized psychiatric care.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Neuroinflammation in Major Depressive Disorder: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Implications

Inflammation contributes to MDD in some patients, but single-marker diagnosis and routine anti-inflammatory treatment are not currently justified, and biomarker-stratified trials are needed to develop precision therapies.

Emilia Włoszek, Bartosz Mikołajek, Anita Godlewska et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Neuroinflammation as a Pharmacological Target in Psychiatric Disorders.

A comprehensive understanding of neuroinflammatory mechanisms may provide new opportunities for developing targeted therapeutic interventions and improving clinical outcomes in psychiatric disorders, including patient stratification and enable precision psychiatry.

P. Karwa, Vaibhav Parekar, Sarthak Buttepatil et al. · 1 citation
Open access Sep 2026

269. Resolution of inflammation in metabolic mood disorders

Abstract Background Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) frequently co-occurs with obesity, insulin resistance, and other metabolic disorders, conditions that share a state of chronic low-grade inflammation. A substantial subgroup of depressed patients exhibits elevated inflammatory biomarkers such as CRP and IL-6, which predict poorer antidepressant response and increased treatment resistance. Existing anti-inflammatory approaches (e.g., cytokine antagonists, COX-2 inhibitors) provide only modest benefits because they block inflammatory signals without restoring endogenous mechanisms that actively resolve inflammation. Specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPMs), including resolvins, lipoxins, and Annexin-A1, represent an active resolution pathway implicated in both mood regulation and metabolic homeostasis. Preliminary evidence shows impaired resolution signaling in depression-prone FSL rats, suggesting a mechanistic link between unresolved inflammation, metabolic vulnerability, and depressive symptoms. Aims & Objectives This project aims to determine whether enhancing inflammatory-resolution pathways using a novel pro-resolving drug (Compound X) improves depressive-like behavior, metabolic dysfunction, and inflammatory biomarkers. A four-phase translational program evaluates: (1) baseline disturbances in resolution pathways in depression models, (2) the antidepressant-like efficacy of Compound X under normal and high-fat diet conditions, (3) Compound X as an augmentation strategy versus classical anti-inflammatory drugs, and (4) a clinical proof-of-concept trial in patients with inflammation-associated depression. Method We combine mechanistic, behavioral, metabolic, molecular, and clinical approaches. Preclinically, depression-prone FSL rats will be investigated under standard or high-fat diets. Compound X will be tested as monotherapy and in combination with low-dose antidepressants to model treatment resistance. Behavioral readouts include forced swim test, sucrose preference, social interaction, and anxiety-related assays. Metabolic outcomes include OGTT, insulin sensitivity, body weight, liver enzymes, and lipidomics. Inflammatory and resolution markers (CRP, cytokines, SPMs, ChemR23, Annexin-A1) will be assessed by ELISA, Olink panels, lipidomics, and molecular profiling. A double-blind randomized trial (60–90 patients with CRP ≥3 mg/L or metabolic syndrome) will evaluate Compound X added to standard antidepressants over 8 weeks. Results We expect (1) impaired resolution signaling in depressed and metabolically challenged animals, (2) antidepressant-like and metabolic-improving effects of Compound X, especially under high-inflammation conditions, (3) restoration of central and peripheral resolution biomarkers, (4) superior augmentation effects compared with classical anti-inflammatory strategies, and (5) clinical improvement in depressive symptoms and inflammatory/metabolic markers in the patient subgroup with elevated inflammation. Discussion & Conclusions This project addresses a major therapeutic gap by directly targeting the resolution of inflammation rather than suppression of inflammatory pathways. Demonstrating that Compound X improves depressive and metabolic outcomes would establish resolution pharmacology as a novel treatment avenue for inflammation-associated depression and facilitate biomarker-guided precision psychiatry.

A. Akhgari, Y. Chaves, S. Joca et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

686. Glutamate dysfunction in treatment-resistant depression: translational and clinical insights

Abstract Background Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) represents a major clinical challenge and is associated with substantial symptom burden, functional impairment, and poor prognosis. Beyond traditional monoaminergic models, converging evidence indicates that dysfunction of the glutamatergic system plays a central role in the pathophysiology of TRD, contributing to impaired neuroplasticity and altered stress-related neural circuitry. Aims & Objectives This lecture aims to provide an integrated overview of the clinical relevance of glutamatergic dysfunction in TRD, combining translational neurobiological evidence with findings from clinical trials and real-world studies. Particular attention is given to the implications of glutamate-based mechanisms for diagnostic refinement, symptom profiling, and personalized treatment strategies. Method A narrative synthesis of evidence from translational research, randomized controlled trials, and real-world observational studies is presented. Key neurobiological findings related to glutamate-mediated synaptic plasticity, excitation–inhibition balance, and NMDA- and AMPA-receptor–dependent mechanisms are discussed alongside clinical data from studies evaluating glutamatergic agents, with a focus on adjunctive intranasal esketamine in routine clinical practice. Results Translational evidence indicates that alterations in glutamatergic signaling contribute to disrupted cortico-limbic network functioning and impaired adaptive stress responses in TRD. Clinically, glutamatergic abnormalities are associated with specific symptom dimensions, including anhedonia, cognitive impairment, affective instability, and sleep–wake dysregulation. Real-world studies of intranasal esketamine demonstrate rapid reductions in depressive severity, improvements in functional outcomes, and an acceptable tolerability profile in heterogeneous and comorbid patient populations. Discussion & Conclusions Glutamatergic dysfunction represents a clinically meaningful dimension of TRD that extends beyond categorical diagnostic boundaries. Integrating mechanistic insights with real-world effectiveness data supports a dimensional and personalized approach to the assessment and management of treatment-resistant mood disorders. Identification of glutamate-related clinical phenotypes may improve prognostic stratification and inform treatment selection in clinical practice.

M. Di Nicola, M. Pepe, G. Martinotti · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.